By Matthew Hayward
On the president unilaterally authorize a military attack "that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation."
Do you think Senator Rand Paul honestly believes these
things or is he just saying them like BO did when he was a
Senator? I really liked many of the things BO said when he was a Senator; in fact, his doing the opposite of much of what he ran is a big part of why I am so furious with him and his administration.
If Rand Paul is sincere in protecting
citizens' rights and his foreign policy of strengthening America first, who
would oppose him as president? (Okay, I know the nonconservative,
globalist, war hawks will not like him, and there will be some one-issue voters
on the left that will not support him, but who would really oppose a candidate
that is running on all of the positive things the last two presidents were
initially elected for, and BOTH did the exact opposite.
On the president unilaterally authorize a military attack "that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation."
Comments
Post a Comment