Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts with the label corporatism

Truth on Trial: Exposing Media's Unholy Alliances

 By Matthew Hayward In a bold encounter, Elon Musk confronted the pressures of corporate censorship, notably rejecting Disney's demands with a resolute " go fuck yourself. " This incident, more than a mere clash of titans, reflects a broader societal concern over the pervasive influence of corporate media. Across the political spectrum, activists recognize the urgent need for independent journalism, challenging the narratives shaped by corporate and governmental alliances that often distort reality. The Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex stands as a glaring example of this influence, especially evident during the COVID-19 pandemic. The collaboration between government and corporate entities in disseminating a unified narrative revealed a disturbing facet of corporatism. This alliance, far from benign, orchestrated a propaganda wave, manipulating public opinion and prioritizing corporate interests over public health and truth. Furthermore, Operation Mockingbird's legacy...

Who would put a political bumper sticker on their car that…

Who would put a political bumper sticker on their car that did not have knowledge about the candidate or issue represented? Who is motivated and willing enough to put a candidate’s bumper sticker on their car while at the same time being ignorant about what the candidate has done or has not done? I do not mean to use the word “ignorant” in a derogatory sense, but as it is defined: “lacking knowledge or information as to a particular subject or fact.” I’ve seen more and more Obama 2012 bumper stickers on cars lately. Every time I see one, I can’t help but think, WHY why would you put that sticker on your car? Though I did not vote for or support Obama in 2008, I do not blame people who did; I get it. (I voted 3rd party) I fail to understand how anyone who supported Obama in 2008 could support him in 2012. Looking at policy actions and taking into account political theater, it would logically follow that 2004 Bush supporters would be Obama’s 2012 base. The logic and reasoning beh...