By Matthew Hayward In the wake of a rare tragedy, it is not uncommon for policymakers to propose public policies with far-reaching implications for the general public. The goal is often to protect a small number of people from harm, whether from themselves, a criminal, or a crazed individual. However, the metrics and methodology used to justify such policies are often flawed, leading to unintended consequences and a loss of personal liberties. One of the main issues with using rare tragedies to justify public policy is that they are statistically insignificant. For example, in the United States, mass shootings make up a tiny fraction of all gun deaths. Yet, they receive disproportionate attention in the media and from policymakers. This leads to a skewed perception of the danger posed by guns and a rush to pass laws that may not be effective in addressing the underlying issues. Furthermore, even when rare tragedies occur, it is often difficult to determine the root cause of the pr...
LimitGov explores the intersection of politics, philosophy, and economics, focusing on cryptocurrency, individual liberty, and free-market values. My blog offers unique insights into current events while examining the implications of government policies and societal trends. I seek to empower readers with knowledge and critical thinking, fostering an informed, engaged community that challenges the status quo without relying on traditional labels.