Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts with the label War

Resonating Hope: A Decade-old Anthem That Still Rings True

By Matthew Hayward  Have you ever wondered what could change if the only thing that shifted was the number of people who lost hope? It's an intriguing, somewhat melancholic thought. As we find ourselves caught in the ebbs and flows of life, it's easy to feel overwhelmed, to lose faith, to question the state of the world and our place in it. During these times, music often becomes our refuge, our silent companion that understands our turmoil. One such powerful piece is "LIBERTY OR DEATH" by JULIO ACOSTA, a song that remarkably still echoes with relevancy and raw emotion, even over ten years after its release. Whether you're a fan of rap or not, I urge you to listen. There's something universal in its verses, a collective sentiment that transcends genres and personal preferences. And yes, while there may be a sprinkle of profanity, its essence lies far beyond those few words. If this song doesn't stir something within you, if you find it hard to connect to i...

What kind of American would not support Rand Paul for President?

By Matthew Hayward Do you think Senator Rand Paul honestly believes these things or is he just saying them like BO did when he was a Senator? I really liked many of the things BO said when he was a Senator; in fact, his doing the opposite of much of what he ran is a big part of why I am so furious with him and his administration. If Rand Paul is sincere in protecting citizens' rights and his foreign policy of strengthening America first, who would oppose him as president? (Okay, I know the nonconservative, globalist, war hawks will not like him, and there will be some one-issue voters on the left that will not support him, but who would really oppose a candidate that is running on all of the positive things the last two presidents were initially elected for, and BOTH did the exact opposite. On the president unilaterally authorize a military attack "that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation."

Modern Politics vs. the Constitution: A Struggle for Relevance

Chairman Henry Hyde states that the Constitution is “Inappropriate and anachronistic.” "There are things in the Constitution that have been overtaken by events (Did I miss an amendment?)  by time. Declaration of war is one of them. There are things no longer relevant to modern society (Like the Constitution?) . Why declare war if you don't have to? (Good point) We are saying to the President, use your judgment. So, to demand that we declare war is to strengthen something to death. You have got a hammerlock on this situation, and it is not called for. Inappropriate, anachronistic, it isn't done anymore." --Chairman Henry Hyde, 10/3/2002, in a session of House of Representatives, during hearing on H.J. Res. 114, "AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ ," discussing Ron Paul's motion to declare war.