Skip to main content

Union Rule Through Fear


It's no wonder so many union members are uninformed and misinformed; every day I see union propaganda that fails to get basic facts correct when messaging to their members.


They mislead and fail to inform members of their rights; but worse than that, they trick members out of their rights altogether.


When it comes to controlling members through fear, that is organized labors specialty. They tell members they are on the verge of losing their benefits and that "radical extremists want to roll back their gains."

Fear-mongering falsehoods


Several unions have been lying to their members in hopes of scaring them away from learning the truth. They are telling their members that the Freedom Foundation "has fought to take away their wage increases, retirement plan, and health benefits" FALSE.


Unions are telling their members that the Freedom Foundation is trying to access their personal information and is bullying and harassing providers. FALSE!


The Freedom Foundation is trying to access public information to educate union members about their constitutional rights. The union, on the other hand, is using its members’ dues to sue in desperation to keep its members from learning their rights.



If all the union did was up-talk themselves and provide quality representation to win over support while respecting people’s rights, I can’t imagine anyone would mind.


The Freedom Foundation is not trying to "sell anything at the door," that is what the union does. The Freedom Foundation is only trying to inform people of their rights.


The union attempts to enter the homes of those they solicit while the Freedom Foundation does not enter anyone’s homes. Instead of trying to push hard sales, the Freedom Foundation simply wants to make sure health care, child care, and teachers are aware of their rights.


I receive calls every day from people who are being harassed by the union. Here are some excerpts from one today. (Keeping names anonymous to protect the member)

“I have been receiving threatening emails from SEIU 775.”

“SEIU has been trying to contact me almost every day now. I have received a letter from them stating that I cannot opt out because I verbally agreed over the phone to pay union dues for another year. Of course, that is false. They called me on the pretense of raising my life Insurance and asked for a verbal yes to that. Never did they say anything about union dues. I called them on it, and she acknowledged that maybe it might have happened. I could not believe she admitted this.”

Here are some more quotes I’ve gotten:

“They pray on her disability”
“It's people like me they bully”
“They are taking advantage of crippled blind kids”
“They make you sign up over the phone, it’s not a choice”
“They came to my house and thrashed me”
“You better not call the Freedom Foundation”
“You need to shut your mouth”
“They called me, and then they came to my house. I felt like I was being harassed”
“They are already taking my money, why won’t they leave me alone”
“I was intimidated”
“They use coercion”
“I felt threatened”
“They are underhanded”
“Can’t depend on them”
“We don’t trust them”
“They use our money against us”
“They are overwhelming us with nonstop emails and mail, they won’t leave us alone”
"When I objected and said I didn’t want to give hundreds of dollars of my money to the union, the union told me to be quiet and stop causing a ruckus,” Rosetta said.
“They lied to me,” she said.

The more I learn about these unions, the more I talk to victims of these unions, the more frustrated I get with them. It makes me wonder how anyone can justify the gains they are getting in light of the lies and oppression they are facilitating.

I have no problem with people organizing, it’s our 1st amendment right! I have a problem with liars who exploit and manipulate people using fear psychology and hateful inaccurate rhetoric.

Shame on SEIU, WEA and WFSE/AFSCME, you are truly disgraceful and scandalous.  






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward July 13, 2025 Let me say this clearly: The National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia, an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court’s decision in Perpich v. Department of Defense rewrote the rules. But legal does not mean constitutional. Gradualism does not legitimize usurpation. You do not get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What is happening now, federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent, is blasphemous. It is an insult to the very spirit of th...

How the Drug War Killed Liberty

 By Matthew Hayward 10/25/2025 When the State Declares War on Behavior Earlier this month, President Trump ordered United States military strikes off the coast of Venezuela, killing alleged “narcoterrorists.” He later boasted, “ We’re just going to kill people that are bringing drugs into our country. ” Those words should chill every American who believes in liberty. Fifty years after Nixon declared his war on drugs, it has evolved from domestic raids to international executions, all under the same failed philosophy that government violence can cure human vice. When the state declares war on human behavior, it always loses and takes the people down with it. Every prison cell, every overdose, every cartel bullet is a monument to the arrogance of government trying to legislate morality. Back in 1988, Ron Paul said it best on The Morton Downey Jr. Show: “You can’t legislate morality. You can’t force people to be better by passing laws. If you want to solve moral and social problems, y...