Skip to main content

Lincoln Leads the Way


An attempt was made to silence Lincoln, but the assignation attempt was foiled this time.

For years, a discussion has been brewing about increasing transparency
in government employee contract negotiations in Washington. Until recently, the unions have maintained their stranglehold on the process, forcing the meetings to be held in secret, hidden from the public's prying eyes.

A county commissioner once asked one of the unions he was to negotiate with what they thought about making employee contract negotiations public.

"The union will not agree to public negotiations...we
 have a contract with the County, not with the public... the public is not a party to the contract." Hannah Franks

Facing the promise of litigation and an aggressive, defensive letter
from the union outlining the “chilling effect and domination it would have on the members,” the county backed off.

Over the next couple of years,’ enough signatures were gathered in 4
cities to petition for a public vote to open contract negotiations to the public. The litigation proceeded and ultimately stopped a vote from ever taking place. The Unions argued such a policy is "legislative in nature," and the people don’t get to vote on such matters. Nor do the elected officials
if the union's bullying tactics are successful.

A breakthrough took place last week!

Facing difficult financial times and struggling to provide basic services,
Lincoln County Commissioners planned to put a tax increase proposal on the ballot. Understanding the conservative values of their constituents, and the overall lack of public trust in government, they decided to pass a resolution on Sep 6th, 2016, stating their intention of opening their employee collective bargaining negotiations to the public, the most expensive part of their budget.

The tax increase proposal passed, but the local Teamsters filed an unfair
labor practice after failing to bully the commissaries into rescinding their resolution and publicly admitting they violated the law.
A little more than two months later, the Teamster's frivolous complaint was dismissed after failing to show how transparent government is harmful. Probably because it's not.

In Lincoln County, transparency was helpful in justifying a tax increase,
and as a side benefit, the employees represented by the Teamsters were happy to get a chance to sit in on the proceedings for the first time.

The elephant in the room is that the state is engaging in closed-door meetings with unions to the tune of 8,000,000,000 dollars of taxpayer
money.

Lincoln County isn’t the problem that needed fixing, but it sets an excellent precedent. With its all-Republican board of commissioners, the relationship between Lincoln County and the union representing its employees was likely appropriately adversarial.
That’s often not the case in jurisdictions where elected Democrats ostensibly represent the public’s interest even though they may have accepted generous campaign contributions from the very unions with whom they must now negotiate.

A compelling case can be made that Governor Jay Inslee would never have become Washington’s governor in the first place without the $6 million in campaign donations he accepted from organized labor – including $3 million from unions with whom he and his surrogates would be writing a new multimillion-dollar contract for in just
 a few months.

Under the circumstances, can anyone seriously argue it’s not in the public interest to let taxpayers see whose side the governor is on? 

Union bosses understand that knowledge is power, and when people are
able to see behind the curtain, they may not be as easy to manipulate.
In a democratic republic like ours, transparency should be the rule,
not the exception. Rather than having to go to court to explain why it is not a good idea for the people to see how their hard-earned taxes are negotiated, the burden of proof should be on the unions and the politicians they control to explain how secrecy and back-room deals
could be a good thing.

Short answer: It isn’t, and the Lincoln County Commissioners deserve
a standing ovation for setting Washington back on the path toward open, responsible, accountable government.
The first domino has fallen; it's only a matter of time before the
next county opens its meetings to the public.

Without government unions electioneering and secret negotiations, without forced union dues, the long-held Democrat control over Washington will slip away into a purple and eventually a red state.

Lincoln Counties' war with the unions will lead to a more transparent and better representative government.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Grassroots Revolt Against GOP Elitism

By Matthew Hayward In the complex arena of political strategy, even those who occupy the highest echelons of power can falter, demonstrating a profound disconnect between their strategic intentions and operational execution. The recent failure to secure the endorsement for their preferred candidate, Dave Reichert, is not merely a setback; it is a revealing exposé of the grave strategic missteps at the heart of the Republican party's establishment in Washington State. These seasoned campaigners, these stewards of conservative strategy, have evidently underestimated the critical importance of grassroots engagement. While I acknowledge the logic behind promoting an established politician strategically positioned geographically and perceived as moderate in our swing state—a strategy driven by considerations of electability, which admittedly has its merits—the incessant focus on this argument and complete lack of any meaningful engagement and education has alienated the grassroots yet a...

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...

When the Census Goes Beyond the Constitution

 By Matthew Hayward The Census: From Counting People to Collecting Control The Constitution established the census as a straightforward tool for representation—nothing more, nothing less. Article I, Section 2 mandates an enumeration every ten years to determine how many representatives each state is allotted. That’s it. Simple. Effective. Proportional representation was the goal, and the census was designed to achieve it. So how did we end up here—with government agents asking about the number of bathrooms in our homes, our ethnic identities, and everything in between? This is the creeping hand of central planning at work. What began as a tool to empower individual representation has been twisted into a mechanism to empower bureaucrats, planners, and those who believe they know better than free individuals how to run their own lives. Central Planning: The False Promise of Data The justification for prying into the most intimate details of our lives is always the same: “We need the ...