Skip to main content

It's Not About the Children

The USA never has, and never will use its military solely for humanitarian purposes.* There are ample examples of atrocities that we have turned a blind eye to.

Thousands of pro-democracy protesters were brutally massacred in the 80s and another uprising in 2007 in Burma/Myanmar. 

The people of America can be motivated to support military use by pictures of dead and dying women and children, but the government is driven by complex geopolitical strategy, military strategical positioning, control of resources, etc.

If the government had not been caught lying about nearly every major military event in our history, maybe more people would believe the propaganda about chemical weapons and evil dictators.

Chemical weapons may have been used, women and children may have been murdered by an evil dictator, but that is not what anyone of this is about.

The public is never told the whole truth; not now, not Benghazi, not Libya, not 9/11/2001, not the USS Liberty, not the 1993 WTC bombing, not OKC,  not the sinking of the Lusitania, not the Gulf of Tokin, not The First Gulf War or the second... we are never told the truth, we are fed a line of crap, whatever is needed to gain public support.

Unless we are attacked, we should not use military force. I do not support preemptive attacks, nor do I believe in engaging in proxy wars, or getting involved in sovereign countries civil wars.

*There are many examples of seemingly humanitarian acts, but every single act has ulterior motives, even if it is simply to try and prove that we care. Think of the USA like the Clinton Foundation; we care about others...as long as there is something in it for us.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Grassroots Revolt Against GOP Elitism

By Matthew Hayward In the complex arena of political strategy, even those who occupy the highest echelons of power can falter, demonstrating a profound disconnect between their strategic intentions and operational execution. The recent failure to secure the endorsement for their preferred candidate, Dave Reichert, is not merely a setback; it is a revealing exposé of the grave strategic missteps at the heart of the Republican party's establishment in Washington State. These seasoned campaigners, these stewards of conservative strategy, have evidently underestimated the critical importance of grassroots engagement. While I acknowledge the logic behind promoting an established politician strategically positioned geographically and perceived as moderate in our swing state—a strategy driven by considerations of electability, which admittedly has its merits—the incessant focus on this argument and complete lack of any meaningful engagement and education has alienated the grassroots yet a...

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...

When the Census Goes Beyond the Constitution

 By Matthew Hayward The Census: From Counting People to Collecting Control The Constitution established the census as a straightforward tool for representation—nothing more, nothing less. Article I, Section 2 mandates an enumeration every ten years to determine how many representatives each state is allotted. That’s it. Simple. Effective. Proportional representation was the goal, and the census was designed to achieve it. So how did we end up here—with government agents asking about the number of bathrooms in our homes, our ethnic identities, and everything in between? This is the creeping hand of central planning at work. What began as a tool to empower individual representation has been twisted into a mechanism to empower bureaucrats, planners, and those who believe they know better than free individuals how to run their own lives. Central Planning: The False Promise of Data The justification for prying into the most intimate details of our lives is always the same: “We need the ...