Skip to main content

Too many politicians hiding behind masks to steal your liberty


For power-hungry opportunists around the country, the ongoing COVID-19 scare continues to be the gift that keeps on giving.

On June 23, for example, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee apparently saw the need for the emergency powers he assumed back in March evaporating, so he ordered the state’s Department of Health to create a mandatory mask requirement.

The following week, King Inslee doubled down by requiring businesses to refuse service to anyone not wearing a mask.

As if it wasn’t bad enough when Inslee four months ago exercised powers, he doesn’t have to impose an arbitrary stay-at-home order that killed dozens—if not hundreds— of private businesses while his allies in state government continued to draw a regular paycheck.

But his latest edict, requiring masks for every large and small public gathering, was even more irresponsible and will almost certainly set neighbors against one another through selective enforcement.

If inciting violence is a criminal act, what do you call the passage of a proclamation directing agencies to require citizens to wear face masks in public and requiring businesses to refuse service to non-masked patrons?

In our highly charged political climate, COVID-19 is both a health concern and a political matter. Depending on whom you talk to, some believe it is not political but purely a matter of public health; meanwhile, others do not find there is any legitimate concern for public health to justify any extreme actions being considered and believe it is entirely political.

What happens when Inslee tells Washingtonians they must wear face masks? Those who believe it is a worthy health concern do so, and those who think it is political hype don’t.

Meanwhile, when there are those who’ve been told their safety is at risk because of another person’s unwillingness to don a mask, you end up with peer pressure and mask shaming.

911 dispatchers nationwide are asking citizens to please stop using the emergency line to report people in public who are not wearing masks. They need the lines open for actual emergencies—like when a woman is attacked in a grocery store by a neighbor whose anger has been stoked by a public health apparatus more interested in giving their governor political cover than keeping people safe.

Not since the Jim Crow laws and segregation have we seen government policy so calculated to inspire division and violence.

With an almost reverse of the Star of David armband or the yellow badges worn by Jews in Nazi Germany, those without face masks will be the ones being targeted and attacked.

It is being said that those who do not wear face coverings are selfish and don’t care if they kill those around them. People are being called murderers for nothing more than walking in the park without a mask.

Gov. Inslee may hide behind the asterisk in his proclamations that the orders will not be enforced or that they should not be enforced by the public, but in our highly divided society, when you use the words “required” and “mandatory,” along with framing the issue in terms of morality, you’re guilty of creating an environment of violence and civil unrest.

Inslee claims there are exemptions for some individuals. Even in Nazi Germany, there were Jews considered essential workers who weren’t forced to wear a Star of David.
But what good are exemptions when you are never able to exercise them in any practical sense? How are businesses supposed to know if a person has a medical or other exemption? Are they going to start asking for a doctor’s note?

In the interest of simplicity, more and most will simply adopt a policy of “no mask, no service.”

Putting the burden of proof on free Americans to show why they shouldn’t have to wear a mark rather than the state to explain why they should is outrageous. The government is manipulating business owners into being the enforcers of the state using Gestapo-like tactics. 

It’s hard enough for a small business to earn a profit without also having to comply with regulations sure to anger its clients and customers.

While the Germans used badges to stigmatize and humiliate the Jews, they also used them to segregate, watch, and control their movements.

Non-mask wearers are now being watched, reported, and tracked. Individuals are being embarrassed and publicly shamed every day.

Governors need to be held accountable for the violence and division they are creating. Americans are free and should never be subjected to wearing a mask or what amounts to a political statement or virtue signaling.

The government does not have the right to force people to take the mask to engage in society and purchase goods and services.

“So that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark.” Revelation 13:17, ESV












Comments

  1. I walked out of the emergency room today for this very reason. I live in America, I am supposed to be free but if I want to be seen,I must wear a mask. Fuck them and fuck their mask. I’ll finds doctor who won’t require a mask and who won’t require a Covid test. No, I didn’t get far enough to find out if covid testing was a requirement but I wasn’t going far enough to be their lemming either.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...