Skip to main content

Enough is enough

By Matthew Hayward

We need more people speaking out like this. Standing up to the self-righteous authoritarianist psychopaths. We are dealing with real human garbage.

Using hyperbolic constant propaganda to create so much fear that people are willing to shame and guilt people who are already facing the loss of their jobs, education, sports, and way of life for refusing to comply with a petty dictator empowered by a State legislative body that willfully neglects their oath of office and their duty to society.

They have won, they have successfully pitted the people against one another. It's hard to maintain compassion for such tools of evil.

If you vote for any of these Democrat legislators in the future, you are a POS. If you are trying to guilt people into compliance, send me your address and I'll mail you a swastika patch. You, people, are scum.

Now let's take it up a notch. If you haven't figured it out yet, we are in the midst of a civil war. The objective is compliance, and the means to accomplish it are increasing daily. 

A majority have complied, but far too many have refused to wave the white flag. This is dangerous to the dictator propagandist.

If enough people #holdtheline, it will encourage others. People might start to realize that they can at any point choose to switch sides, that being vaccinated does not mean that they can't stand with those who are on the front line facing termination.

What happens if enough people refuse to work? I'll tell you, the people cease giving consent and the dictator falls. If the people stand together, the people win.

The question is, do enough people who have what it takes to make a stand, risk comfort and security in the name of liberty?

And if there aren't enough people willing to take a stand in the public sector, will the private sector, small businesses continue to cater to those who failed to have the courage to stand, those who activity stood on the other side of this battle, or with those in the private sector make their stand?

Come Oct 18, if anyone is fired, I'm calling for private sector businesses to have solidarity for those who take a stand, put a sign in your front window, or on your door that says public employees aren't welcome. 

No one is innocent, everyone will pick a side, you are either with the people pushing back and risking everything they have, or you are against them.

"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Winston S. Churchill




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...
Post a Comment
Read more

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...
1 comment
Read more

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...
Post a Comment
Read more