Skip to main content

Is the time for Revolution upon us

Resisting the impending transformation of our monetary system is a cause worthy of a historical revolution.

I do not utter these words lightly. There's no turning back once we embark on the journey toward Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). We will find ourselves inextricably bound to the state, our freedoms tethered to their whims.

No, this won't occur overnight. It will begin innocuously enough. In their naivety, many will embrace it, scoffing at the warnings of those who see the larger picture. In doing so, they will not only be forging their own chains but also condemning future generations to a dystopian world of their making.


Privacy Concerns
With CBDCs, every transaction you make can be monitored. The veil of financial privacy we currently enjoy, albeit thinning, will be lifted entirely. This level of oversight could be used to control or manipulate economic behavior, a serious concern for civil liberties.

Exclusion Risks
With a state-controlled digital currency, the government could potentially exert unprecedented control over our finances. Imagine a world where your money could be turned off like a switch if you fall foul of certain rules or fail to meet specific social criteria. This isn't just about access to technology; it's about the potential for a 'social credit' system where your financial freedom is at the mercy of the state. This level of control could lead to a society where compliance is not a choice but a necessity for survival.


To those who declare, "I'll stick to cash; I won't use CBDCs," consider this: Do you genuinely believe you'll be able to travel freely, make substantial purchases, and live your life as you do now? As the state's control tightens, your ability to navigate life on your own terms will become increasingly challenging. The state's grip will constrict, and survival will become a game played by their rules.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...

Reality Is Rigged and You Can Hack It

By Matthew Hayward 7/29/2025 Manifesting Reality: How the Matrix, Quantum Entanglement, and Consciousness Intertwine Look, science fiction and science fact have been flirting for decades. But lately, the line between the two is starting to disappear. The idea that we’re living in a simulated reality isn’t just a late-night stoner theory anymore. It’s a framework, a lens to view those weird, unexplained moments that leave you thinking, "What the hell just happened?" Quantum entanglement, synchronicity, manifestation… they all start to make a lot more sense when you stop pretending reality is some rigid, mechanical machine. It’s not. It’s code. And if you’re paying attention, you might just figure out how to rewrite it. NPCs vs Manifestors: Who’s Really Running Things? Picture the world like a massive open-world video game. Some people are just running the default programming. They go to work, follow the script, consume what they’re told, and never ask questions. NPCs. Then the...