Skip to main content

What is the Bitcoin halving and what does it mean for the price of Bitcoin?

By Matthew Hayward 

Price of Bitcoin on this date: $28,092

As the next Bitcoin halving approaches in April 2024, many are left wondering what this event means for the price of Bitcoin, especially given the increased adoption and massive reduction in available supply on exchanges. To understand its potential impact, it is essential to grasp the concept of halving and its historical significance.

Bitcoin Halving Explained

Bitcoin halving, also known as halvening, is a process that occurs approximately every four years, cutting the rewards miners receive for validating transactions and adding new blocks to the blockchain in half. This event is designed to control inflation and maintain a capped supply of 21 million Bitcoins.

Historical Significance

Since its inception, there have been three Bitcoin halvings (in 2012, 2016, and 2020). Each time, the event has contributed to a significant price increase. For example, Bitcoin reached an all-time high of almost $69,000 in November 2021, 18 months after its 2020 halving.

Predictions for the 2024 Halving

The upcoming halving has led to optimistic predictions from various analysts. Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Jamie Douglas Coutts predicts that Bitcoin could reach $50,000 by April 2024. Markus Thielen, the research head at Matrixport, is even more bullish, estimating a price of around $65,623 by April 2024.

Increased Adoption and Decreased Supply

The current market scenario suggests that the 2024 halving could have a more profound impact on Bitcoin's price than previous halvings. The increased adoption of cryptocurrencies, particularly Bitcoin, has led to a massive reduction in available supply on exchanges. As demand for Bitcoin continues to grow and the supply decreases due to the halving, basic economics suggests that the price will likely rise.

Other Factors to Consider

While the historical price increases following halvings bode well for Bitcoin's future price, it's essential to acknowledge other factors that could affect the outcome. For instance, regulatory crackdowns, competition from other digital assets, and changes in global economic conditions could also influence Bitcoin's price. Furthermore, Bitcoin's growth in the future may not be as substantial as in previous cycles due to the increased market size and competition from other digital assets.

That said, the upcoming Bitcoin halving in 2024 is expected to result in a significant price increase due to its inherent supply reduction and the growing adoption of cryptocurrencies. 

https://youtu.be/uWboFmkpkko







Updated video on the day of the halving (4/19/2024)



Labels:
Location: Olympia, WA, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...
Post a Comment
Read more

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...
Post a Comment
Read more

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...
1 comment
Read more