Skip to main content

Debunking the Myth of Consumer Rights in the Gift Card Saga

 By Matthew Hayward

2/24/2024

In a world increasingly dominated by emotionalist socialism, the recent uproar over unused gift cards in Washington State serves as a prime example of the dangerous erosion of personal responsibility and the fundamental principles of capitalism. The push for legislation to protect consumers from their own choices under the guise of corporate accountability is a misguided venture that undermines the very essence of a free market economy.

At the heart of the matter is the assertion that large companies, like Starbucks, are exploiting consumers by retaining unspent funds on gift cards. The proposed solution? Forcing these companies to surrender these funds to the Department of Revenue as unclaimed property. This move is heralded as a victory for consumer rights, but in reality, it is a dangerous precedent that infringes upon the sanctity of voluntary exchange and contract freedom.

The notion that consumers are somehow entitled to protection from their own decisions is a fallacy that disregards the fundamental tenet of capitalism: you get what you pay for. When an individual purchases a gift card, they enter into a voluntary agreement with the issuing company. The terms are clear, and the choice is made freely. If the card goes unused, it is not a result of corporate greed but rather a consequence of personal inaction.

The proposed legislation, which seeks to allow consumers to cash out small amounts on gift cards and impose regulations on informing customers of unspent funds, is a paternalistic overreach that treats adults like children unable to bear the consequences of their own actions. It is a classic case of emotionalist socialism attempting to shield individuals from the realities of life, thereby eroding the concept of personal responsibility.

The exemption of small businesses from these reforms reveals the inherent bias against larger corporations, painting them as the villains in a narrative that ignores the complexities of economic transactions. This is not a battle against corporate greed; it is an assault on the principles of free enterprise and individual autonomy.

It's not surprising that SEIU 775 is advocating for such legislation; they are accustomed to blatantly misusing their members' dues. Instead of focusing on genuine representation and bargaining, public employee unions often divert resources to push for policies that undermine individual liberty and free market principles. They collect dues from some of the least-paid workers, and then instead of working on getting them better pay, they spend on unrelated social-political issues and on trying to unionize and benefit other workers to increase their revenue base. They tell their members that they are abusing, that the ends justify the means, that by using their dues to help others it will trickle down to benefiting them.

The gift card debacle in Washington State is a stark reminder of the dangers posed by the encroachment of emotionalist socialist policies on our economic freedoms. The solution is not more legislation but rather a return to the core values of personal responsibility and respect for voluntary agreements. It is time to stand against the tide of emotionalism and defend the foundations of capitalism, lest we find ourselves adrift in a sea of entitlement and dependency.


Related blogs:

Our Maternal Government

Enemy of the Free Market Retires

Is there no end to the nanny state?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...

Reality Is Rigged and You Can Hack It

By Matthew Hayward 7/29/2025 Manifesting Reality: How the Matrix, Quantum Entanglement, and Consciousness Intertwine Look, science fiction and science fact have been flirting for decades. But lately, the line between the two is starting to disappear. The idea that we’re living in a simulated reality isn’t just a late-night stoner theory anymore. It’s a framework, a lens to view those weird, unexplained moments that leave you thinking, "What the hell just happened?" Quantum entanglement, synchronicity, manifestation… they all start to make a lot more sense when you stop pretending reality is some rigid, mechanical machine. It’s not. It’s code. And if you’re paying attention, you might just figure out how to rewrite it. NPCs vs Manifestors: Who’s Really Running Things? Picture the world like a massive open-world video game. Some people are just running the default programming. They go to work, follow the script, consume what they’re told, and never ask questions. NPCs. Then the...