Skip to main content

Breaking: New $500 Million Government Study Finds Government Employees Oppose Cutting Government Jobs

Breaking: New $500 Million Government Study Finds Government Employees Oppose Cutting Government Jobs

By: Matthew Hayward

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a shocking revelation that absolutely no one saw coming, a newly released $500 million government-funded study has found that government employees are overwhelmingly against cutting government jobs, reducing waste, or making government more efficient.

The 10-year study, commissioned by a bipartisan coalition known as the Committee to Study Studies About Studies, spent a decade analyzing the complex question of whether bureaucrats enjoy having taxpayer-funded jobs. The answer, after extensive focus groups, surveys, and catered team-building retreats? A resounding “No” to anything that might involve layoffs, accountability, or a world where they have to produce measurable results.

“This data is crystal clear,” said Dr. Preston Bloatworthy, lead researcher on the study, while adjusting his government-issued ergonomic office chair. “Government employees do not support reductions in their own departments. They also strongly oppose efforts to cut fraud, waste, or unnecessary expenditures. In fact, we found that the word ‘efficiency’ triggered higher stress levels among respondents than ‘nuclear war’ or ‘being asked to show up to work on time.’”

The study, which required the hiring of 2,000 additional researchers, four new government task forces, and a new division within the Department of Redundant Research, found that 99.8% of federal employees surveyed agreed with the statement: “I support reducing government waste, as long as it does not affect me personally in any way.”

In response to the study, Elon Musk has reportedly begun purchasing large amounts of unused government office space, turning them into “X Premium Cubicle Workhouses” where employees will be required to justify their existence in 280-character tweets or be reassigned to a Soylent Green processing facility.

Meanwhile, the White House has announced an emergency $1 trillion “Government Job Security Initiative” to prevent even a single bureaucrat from losing their pension benefits, ensuring America’s most vital workforce—people whose entire job is attending Zoom meetings and forwarding emails—remains fully funded.

At press time, an additional $250 million study was approved to analyze whether further studies on this topic would be necessary, just to be safe.

Labels:
Location: Olympia, WA, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...
1 comment
Read more

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Reality Is Rigged and You Can Hack It

By Matthew Hayward 7/29/2025 Manifesting Reality: How the Matrix, Quantum Entanglement, and Consciousness Intertwine Look, science fiction and science fact have been flirting for decades. But lately, the line between the two is starting to disappear. The idea that we’re living in a simulated reality isn’t just a late-night stoner theory anymore. It’s a framework, a lens to view those weird, unexplained moments that leave you thinking, "What the hell just happened?" Quantum entanglement, synchronicity, manifestation… they all start to make a lot more sense when you stop pretending reality is some rigid, mechanical machine. It’s not. It’s code. And if you’re paying attention, you might just figure out how to rewrite it. NPCs vs Manifestors: Who’s Really Running Things? Picture the world like a massive open-world video game. Some people are just running the default programming. They go to work, follow the script, consume what they’re told, and never ask questions. NPCs. Then the...
Post a Comment
Read more