Skip to main content

The Most Underrated Asset in Crypto Right Now

June 27, 2025

By Matthew Hayward

Current LINK price: $13.03


Everyone’s Chasing Hype. I’m Watching Chainlink.

In a world where crypto hype is louder than a nightclub at midnight, one project is quietly laying the pipes for the future of finance — and almost no one’s talking about it.

While influencers flood your feed with meme coins, XRP cult jargon, and “top 5 altcoins to buy before Friday,” Chainlink (LINK) is doing something radical:

It’s working.

No BitBoy pump. No delusional army. No sugar-coated nonsense.

Just cold, hard utility.

The Most Underrated Project in Crypto?

Let’s run the checklist:

✅ MasterCard partnership

✅ Powering SWIFT and DTCC pilots

✅ Securing billions in DeFi with oracles

✅ Launching CCIP to bridge traditional finance and Web3

✅ Zero hype, maximal development

While the rest of the market is a casino, Chainlink is the infrastructure behind the scenes. It’s not trying to be flashy. It’s trying to be indispensable.

And it’s succeeding.

Numbers Don’t Lie — But They Whisper

The data paints a picture the price doesn’t:

Monthly active addresses still hover in the thousands, showing continued real usage — not ghost town traffic.

Daily active wallets dropped ~66% from February highs (from 9,400 to 3,200), filtering out short-term speculators.

Yet non-empty wallets just hit an all-time high — nearly 770,000 addresses now hold LINK. That’s ~7,900 new holders this month alone.

In early 2025, whales moved LINK in $100K+ chunks over 1,650 times, the most since December 2023. They aren’t tweeting. They’re accumulating.

The MVRV ratio sits around –15%, placing LINK firmly in the historical “opportunity zone,” where long-term investors quietly load up before the rerate.

All of that? Happening while no one is paying attention.

Narrative Is Lagging Behind Reality

Every cycle has its sleeper pick. In 2017 it was Ethereum. In 2020 it was Solana.

In 2025, it’s Chainlink.

The mainstream hasn’t caught on yet. But when CNBC starts name-dropping LINK because BlackRock, SWIFT, or JPMorgan is using Chainlink CCIP to move trillions across blockchains, it’ll already be up 3–5x.

By the time the masses believe, the price will reflect it.

Final Thought

If you believe crypto’s future lies in real-world adoption — not hype, not speculation, but actual usage — then Chainlink isn’t just a good investment.

It’s the investment.

Not because some influencer said so.

Not because of a flashy chart.

But because the data says so.

And the data doesn’t lie.



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...
Post a Comment
Read more

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...
Post a Comment
Read more

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...
1 comment
Read more