Skip to main content

Who would put a political bumper sticker on their car that…

Who would put a political bumper sticker on their car that did not have knowledge about the candidate or issue represented? Who is motivated and willing enough to put a candidate’s bumper sticker on their car while at the same time being ignorant about what the candidate has done or has not done? I do not mean to use the word “ignorant” in a derogatory sense, but as it is defined: “lacking knowledge or information as to a particular subject or fact.”

I’ve seen more and more Obama 2012 bumper stickers on cars lately. Every time I see one, I can’t help but think, WHY why would you put that sticker on your car? Though I did not vote for or support Obama in 2008, I do not blame people who did; I get it. (I voted 3rd party) I fail to understand how anyone who supported Obama in 2008 could support him in 2012. Looking at policy actions and taking into account political theater, it would logically follow that 2004 Bush supporters would be Obama’s 2012 base.

The logic and reasoning behind a person who supported Obama in 2008 supporting Obama in 2012 are either based on fear and ignorance, or people are suffering from cognitive dissonance, also known as compartmentalized thinking. It is a combination of the three. There is the most simple fear of party politics, but that fear is based on cognitive dissonance; we all know that regardless of what party is in power, the militarism and loss of liberty and legislation to benefit the banks will continue.  This state of mind, blocking out disturbing facts, can be quite powerful, especially when so many people want things to change. Often the desire is so powerful people start to believe things might actually change this time.

While most people who supported Obama in 2008 wanted to end the wars, torturing, bank bailouts, and infringement on our civil liberties, i.e., the warrantless wiretapping, the Patriot Act, and so on, Obama continued and increased all of these matters to the point of creating a hit list for assassinations, including American citizens and defended the concept of “thought crimes” similar to the movie, Minority Report. While Bush went to war without a declaration, he did get Congress’s consent by default of a resolution to authorize force. Obama unilaterally authorized a military attack in Libya. But I do not wish to go point by point through Obama’s lies and or failed promises. That said, I will note that Obama once said:

“The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.” DEC 20th 2007.


I want to point out the fact that Glenn Greenwald, Daniel Ellsberg,  Ralph Nader, Dennis Kucinich, Amy Goodman, Noam Chomsky, and many other respected voices on the Left have completely destroyed Obama; there is no need for me to do it again. Rachel Maddow’s show “Obama’s Preventive and Indefinite Detention” is one of my all-time favorites. All that said, some of these critics and many Left-wing talking heads that have made mention of some or all of these faults fall back and ask their viewers and listeners to go ahead and vote for Obama anyway.

The tactics used to rally the Left behind Obama range from resorting to ad-hominem attacks like “Tea Baggers” and “Republican.” In contrast, others focus on the Republicans standing in the way of Obama and the Democrats from getting anything done. It is often said that the Republicans want to see the country fail so they can blame and beat Obama,  “Obstructionists,” they cry. Then they often point to the fact that Obama did not create this economic crisis; Bush and the Republicans did. (Once upon a time, they also brought up the fact that Obama did not get us into Iraq, several bombings of new countries later, they tend to leave that one alone.) Long story short, when you get into the manus, Obama resigned the Patriot Act, regularly supports drone bombings, assassinations, a massive expansion of privacy invasion, and bails out the 1%. There is no defense for his sins; there is no amount of changing the subject and shifting the issues that can hide the fact that Obama is a corporatist and a globalist that has no regard or respect for the United States Constitution. (Much like Bush and 99% of the 1%)

“Mr.William Daley from JP Morgan Chase as White House Chief of Staff. Mr. Gene Sperling from the Goldman Sachs payroll to be director of the National Economic Council. Eileen Rominger from Goldman Sachs named director of the SEC's Investment Management division. Even the National Security Advisor, Thomas Donilon, was executive vice president for law and policy at the disgraced Fannie Mae after serving as a corporate lobbyist with O'Melveny & Roberts. The keystone of the business friendly team was put in place on Friday. General Electric Chairman and CEO Jeffrey Immelt will serve as chair of the president's Council on Jobs and Competitiveness.”

Just how tied in with Wall Street is the Obama administration?

'The Wall Street takeover of the Obama administration is now complete.'

Ellsberg Speech - March 19, 2011

Obama- Preventive and Indefinite Detention (Rachel Maddow)

The Obama justice system
By Glenn Greenwald

Daniel Ellsberg & Ralph Nader Join March 19th Protest in D.C. Marking 8th Anniversary of Iraq War

Olbermann on Obama's assassination program
Also: By Glenn Greenwald

President Obama 'orders Pakistan drone attacks


Court allows constitutional challenge to new FISA law

Dennis Kucinich: Obama Talked To The U.N. He Talked With The Arab League But No Time For Congress!

Dennis Kucinich: Libya Air Strikes Could Be 'Impeachable Offense'

The Plain Truth on Wars of Intervention

Dems Rip Obama on Libya, Bring Up 'Impeachable Offense' 

Rand Paul & Dennis Kucinich Talk About Obama Libya Lawsuit On CNN

"War, Debt and the President" By Amy Goodman

Bush and Cheney committed war crimes, and Obama is doing the same crimes (Ralph Nader)

Dennis Kucinich, "This Administration Headed By Constitutional Scholar, Is Ignoring The Constitution!"

Noam Chomsky to RT: Bush torturer, Obama just kills

The due-process-free assassination of U.S. citizens is now a reality: By Glenn Greenwad

FOX: California's Medical Marijuana Industry Getting Stoned - Ron Paul 2012

Will Obama be a one-term President?

Democrat Obstructionism to Blame for Latest Government Funding Crisis

Jobs bill fight continues after Senate defeat

Obama, Romney, and Goldman Sachs - 2012

11/7/11: Is Obama President or an Executive Dictator?





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Grassroots Revolt Against GOP Elitism

By Matthew Hayward In the complex arena of political strategy, even those who occupy the highest echelons of power can falter, demonstrating a profound disconnect between their strategic intentions and operational execution. The recent failure to secure the endorsement for their preferred candidate, Dave Reichert, is not merely a setback; it is a revealing exposĂ© of the grave strategic missteps at the heart of the Republican party's establishment in Washington State. These seasoned campaigners, these stewards of conservative strategy, have evidently underestimated the critical importance of grassroots engagement. While I acknowledge the logic behind promoting an established politician strategically positioned geographically and perceived as moderate in our swing state—a strategy driven by considerations of electability, which admittedly has its merits—the incessant focus on this argument and complete lack of any meaningful engagement and education has alienated the grassroots yet a...

The Heavy Toll of Reclaiming Freedom

By Matthew Hayward The struggle for freedom has been a recurring act in the grand theater of human history. Yet, there is a philosophical argument that once freedoms are lost, they are irretrievably gone. This perspective, while disheartening, merits exploration. It's a chilling echo of the words of the trailblazing libertarian Claire Wolfe, "America is at that awkward stage; it's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." The first act in this tragic play is the rise of technology. As we advance technologically, the tools of distraction become more potent. The Roman Coliseum has been replaced by the smartphone, a device that can pacify and distract with unprecedented efficiency. This technological pacification, while seemingly benign, has a sinister side. It diverts attention from the erosion of freedoms, making it easier for those in power to chip away at our liberties unnoticed. Consider the pervasive surveillance facilitated by our ...

The Quiet Surrender of Liberty

 By Matthew Hayward The slow poison of complacency is the death of the fighting spirit. History is filled with examples of once-free people who gradually surrendered their liberty, not in a single stroke but through a series of quiet concessions. Tyranny often doesn’t arrive with the sound of thunder; it creeps in like a thief in the night, taking advantage of human complacency. The most maddening aspect of this process is not the power-hungry forces behind it, it is the passive, apathetic acceptance by the very people it seeks to control. Complacency is the death knell of liberty. It dulls the senses, erodes vigilance, and normalizes oppression over time. What once sparked outrage and resistance becomes routine, accepted as the new normal. The body scanners at TSA checkpoints, the Patriot Act, the ever-expanding surveillance state, each started with public protests and fiery debates. Now, these violations of privacy and freedom are woven into the fabric of everyday life. Why do pe...