Metrics and Methodology: The Failure in Determining the Justification for Public Policy

By Matthew Hayward

In the wake of a rare tragedy, it is not uncommon for policymakers to propose public policies with far-reaching implications for the general public. The goal is often to protect a small number of people from harm, whether from themselves, a criminal, or a crazed individual. However, the metrics and methodology used to justify such policies are often flawed, leading to unintended consequences and a loss of personal liberties.

One of the main issues with using rare tragedies to justify public policy is that they are statistically insignificant. For example, in the United States, mass shootings make up a tiny fraction of all gun deaths. Yet, they receive disproportionate attention in the media and from policymakers. This leads to a skewed perception of the danger posed by guns and a rush to pass laws that may not be effective in addressing the underlying issues.

Furthermore, even when rare tragedies occur, it is often difficult to determine the root cause of the problem. For example, after a school shooting, policymakers may propose stricter gun control laws, but this ignores other potential contributing factors such as mental health issues, bullying, or a lack of resources for troubled youth. Without a comprehensive understanding of the problem, developing effective policies that address the underlying issues is impossible.

Another issue with using rare tragedies to justify public policy is that it can lead to a loss of personal liberties. For example, after the 9/11 attacks, the US government passed the Patriot Act, granting the broad government powers to surveil its citizens. While this law was intended to prevent future terrorist attacks, it has also been used to infringe on the privacy rights of law-abiding citizens.

In order to develop effective public policies that do not infringe on personal liberties, policymakers must use sound metrics and methodology to determine the root causes of problems and develop evidence-based solutions. This requires a comprehensive understanding of the issue and a willingness to consider all contributing factors.

Policymakers must be willing to engage in open and honest dialogue with the public to ensure that any proposed policies are in line with public values and beliefs. This includes soliciting feedback from all stakeholders, including those who may be directly impacted by the proposed policy.

The use of rare tragedies to justify public policy is often fraught with issues stemming from flawed metrics and methodology. To develop effective policies that do not infringe on personal liberties, policymakers must use sound metrics and methodology to determine the root causes of problems and develop evidence-based solutions. They must also engage in open and honest dialogue with the public to ensure that any proposed policies are in line with public values and beliefs. Only then can we ensure that public policies are effective, just, and equitable for all.

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

By Matthew Hayward 9/19/2025 The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning. This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement. Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...

Search This Blog