Skip to main content

When a Governor Thinks He is the King

On February 29, 2020, COVID-19 Proclamation 20-05 was signed by Governor Jay Inslee, declaring a state of emergency. 

 
Nearly every reasonable person understood the concern over an unknown virus. Few people took any issue with the governor's emergency declaration or even some of the more extreme measures to follow. 
 
When the shelter-in-place order was first issuedit wasn’t enforced but was merely a suggestion, and few people took exception. I thought it was an overreaction but was willing to comply. 
 
Little did we know at the time that this proclamation was the beginning of a long train of abuses that would lead to hundreds of unchecked, unilateral decisions by the governor. 
 
Since Governor Inslee took office in 2013, he has averaged eleven proclamations per year, totaling 77 prior to 2020. Most of the proclamations have been declarations of emergencies; ten were calls for a special legislative session. 
 
Inslee has now made over 320 proclamations without calling for a special legislative session. Making things worse, Inslee disbanded the bipartisan business recovery task force composed of lawmakers and replaced it with Safe Start advisory groups made up of campaign contributors and political allies. 
 
On June 23, 2020, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee ordered the state's Department of Health to create a mandatory mask requirement for citizens. 
  
The following week, King Inslee doubled down by requiring businesses to refuse service to anyone not wearing a mask. 
 
The governor’s poorly thought-out, unilateral action has led to civil unrest. Ironically, in contrast to his intentions, large gatherings became commonplace in protest of the governor's proclamations. 
 
Dozens, if not hundreds, of articles, have been written in recent months about employees, customers, and citizens facing violence over wearing or not wearing a mask. 
 
Obvious but unintended consequences have included unnecessary use of 911 emergency services and verbal and physical assaults against service workers as well as customers. 
 
NPR reported Home Depot would not enforce Washington State’s mask mandate because it was not safe for its employees. (Home Depot later changed their position) 
 
If inciting violence is a criminal act, what do you call the passage of a proclamation directing agencies to require citizens to wear face masks in public and requiring businesses to refuse service to non-masked patrons? 
  
In our highly charged political climate, COVID-19 is both a health concern and a political matter. Depending on who you talk to, some believe this issue is not political but purely related to public health. Meanwhile, others do not find any legitimate justification for considering extreme actions for the benefit of public health and believe it is entirely political. 
  
What happened when Inslee required Washingtonians to wear face masks? Those who believed it a worthy health concern or feared legal or social backlash obeyed, and those who thought it was political hype refused. 
  
Meanwhile, the governor was warning people their safety was at risk because of another person's unwillingness to don a mask, leading to peer pressure, mask shaming, and assaults. 
 
Is this about science or politics? Not since Jim Crow laws and segregation were enforced have we seen government policy so calculated to inspire division and violence. 

Many have said that those who do not wear face coverings are selfish and don't care if they kill those around them. People have been labeled murderers for walking in the park without a mask. 
 
When Gov. Inslee uses words like "required" and "mandatory,frames the issue in terms of morality, and selectively enforces the orders, he is guilty of creating an environment of violence and civil unrest. 
 
We must rein in the seemingly unlimited powers the governor believes have been bestowed upon him through the issuance of unilateral dictates and proclamations. 
 
At least one group, Restore Washington, is pushing an initiative for reform to put some limitations on how long a governor is able to legislate without checks and balances. 
 
Initiative 1114 is intended to limit the governor's emergency powers to fourteen days unless extended by the legislature. 
 
It's time to end this madness. It is time to use one last proclamation to call our elected officials into a special session. 
 
We deserve to hear our elected representatives weigh in on the fate of Washington’s businesses and the civil rights and health concerns of its citizens. 

Even President Trump—while dealing with a divided Congress—has been able and willing to work with and pass legislation related to COVID-19. Why won’t Washington’s Governor work with our elected officials to govern? 
 
We must have a robust bipartisan debate, expert testimony, committee hearings, public commentsand amendments. And above all else, our legislative body must vote before the governor either signs a bill into law or vetoes it. 
 
Let's follow the outlined and intended process—let's bring our legislators back to Olympia.




 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Grassroots Revolt Against GOP Elitism

By Matthew Hayward In the complex arena of political strategy, even those who occupy the highest echelons of power can falter, demonstrating a profound disconnect between their strategic intentions and operational execution. The recent failure to secure the endorsement for their preferred candidate, Dave Reichert, is not merely a setback; it is a revealing exposé of the grave strategic missteps at the heart of the Republican party's establishment in Washington State. These seasoned campaigners, these stewards of conservative strategy, have evidently underestimated the critical importance of grassroots engagement. While I acknowledge the logic behind promoting an established politician strategically positioned geographically and perceived as moderate in our swing state—a strategy driven by considerations of electability, which admittedly has its merits—the incessant focus on this argument and complete lack of any meaningful engagement and education has alienated the grassroots yet a...

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...

When the Census Goes Beyond the Constitution

 By Matthew Hayward The Census: From Counting People to Collecting Control The Constitution established the census as a straightforward tool for representation—nothing more, nothing less. Article I, Section 2 mandates an enumeration every ten years to determine how many representatives each state is allotted. That’s it. Simple. Effective. Proportional representation was the goal, and the census was designed to achieve it. So how did we end up here—with government agents asking about the number of bathrooms in our homes, our ethnic identities, and everything in between? This is the creeping hand of central planning at work. What began as a tool to empower individual representation has been twisted into a mechanism to empower bureaucrats, planners, and those who believe they know better than free individuals how to run their own lives. Central Planning: The False Promise of Data The justification for prying into the most intimate details of our lives is always the same: “We need the ...