Skip to main content

A Dangerous Game: The Politics of Team USA

It's not every day that sports and politics cross paths so explicitly. Yet, we live in extraordinary times where athletes leverage their platforms to voice their social and political stances. In 2020, team USA, both the U.S. Women's National Team (USWNT) and U.S. Men's National Team (USMNT), joined this trend, endorsing the Black Lives Matter movement. The players wore apparel adorned with supportive messages and made public statements against systemic racism and police brutality. As admirable as these initiatives are, they walk a thin line, potentially turning Team USA from a unifying national symbol into a politically charged entity.

In November 2020, the USWNT took to the field against the Netherlands with a simple yet loaded message: Black Lives Matter. They made it clear that their message was not political but a statement on human rights, intending to draw attention to systemic racism. Meanwhile, the USMNT displayed a similar stand with jackets inscribed with "Be the Change" along with personal messages reflecting the players' beliefs.

These gestures reveal a commendable awareness and readiness to tackle societal issues head-on. However, there is an inherent risk in this approach. While advocating for equality and justice, the Black Lives Matter movement is tied to a specific political organization with a range of social and political agendas, many of which are controversial and divisive.

As national teams, the USWNT and USMNT are embodiments of American unity. They carry the American flag, representing their country in sports and reflecting its diverse population's collective spirit. The moment these teams attach themselves to a specific political movement, they risk becoming polarizing figures themselves. This runs counter to their fundamental role of bringing people together regardless of political, racial, or cultural differences.

While it's crucial that we continue conversations about racial inequality and social justice, the national teams must consider how they approach such sensitive issues. Aligning with a politically charged movement like Black Lives Matter, however well-intentioned, is clearly not the best course.

These teams could focus instead on promoting overall values like equality, justice, and unity without affiliating with any political organization. After all, sports have always had the power to transcend politics and societal divisions, uniting people under a shared passion and national pride. Our national teams should harness this power - the power to unite and inspire, fostering an environment of acceptance and mutual respect devoid of political controversy.

The challenge for our national teams lies in navigating this complex landscape. They must find a way to take a stand against injustice while maintaining their position as unifying symbols for the nation. It's a delicate balancing act, no doubt, but one they must strive to achieve to preserve the unifying spirit of sport.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...