Skip to main content

Balancing Drag Queen Story Hour with Militia Tales

 By Matthew Hayward


As an observer of American society, I've noticed a fascinating trend that has sparked heated debates across our country: the rise of "Drag Queen Story Hour." While many have praised these events for their celebration of diversity and inclusivity, they have also faced criticism from those who question the appropriateness of the subject matter for children. As a conservative parent and a staunch believer in the First Amendment, I would like to propose an alternative: a "Militia Story Hour."

Before you dismiss the idea outright, let me clarify what I mean by "Militia Story Hour." This would not be a forum for advocating violence or promoting extremist ideologies. It would instead be an opportunity for children and parents to learn about the history and role of militias in the United States, from the Revolutionary War to the present times. It could also provide a platform for discussing American values like self-reliance, independence, and the right to defend oneself and one's community.

Just as Drag Queen Story Hour aims to foster understanding and acceptance of the LGBTQ+ community, Militia Story Hour could potentially encourage understanding and acceptance of different political ideologies and lifestyles. It could shed light on why some Americans feel the need to form and join militias, which are often misunderstood and stigmatized.

I anticipate criticism and resistance to this idea, much like the pushback faced by Drag Queen Story Hour. However, my proposition comes from a place of wanting to foster dialogue, understanding, and inclusivity, just like those who support and organize Drag Queen Story Hour do.

We would not shy away from exposing our children to different ideas and perspectives in an ideal world. Instead, we would give them the tools to think critically and make their own judgments. We would teach them that it's okay to agree to disagree and that different viewpoints can coexist in the same society.

We are at a crucial juncture in our nation's history, a time when our society is more polarized than ever. Now more than ever, we need to foster dialogue and understanding within and between our echo chambers.

Militia Story Hour may not be the perfect solution, but it represents a step towards acknowledging and respecting the diversity of thought that exists in our country. It's a proposition that challenges us to step out of our comfort zones, confront our biases, and engage in meaningful conversation with those whose views differ from our own.

In the end, isn't that what true diversity and inclusivity are all about?




Labels:
Location: Olympia, WA, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...
1 comment
Read more

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...
Post a Comment
Read more

How the Drug War Killed Liberty

 By Matthew Hayward 10/25/2025 When the State Declares War on Behavior Earlier this month, President Trump ordered United States military strikes off the coast of Venezuela, killing alleged “narcoterrorists.” He later boasted, “ We’re just going to kill people that are bringing drugs into our country. ” Those words should chill every American who believes in liberty. Fifty years after Nixon declared his war on drugs, it has evolved from domestic raids to international executions, all under the same failed philosophy that government violence can cure human vice. When the state declares war on human behavior, it always loses and takes the people down with it. Every prison cell, every overdose, every cartel bullet is a monument to the arrogance of government trying to legislate morality. Back in 1988, Ron Paul said it best on The Morton Downey Jr. Show: “You can’t legislate morality. You can’t force people to be better by passing laws. If you want to solve moral and social problems, y...
Post a Comment
Read more