Skip to main content

Holding the Foot Soldiers of Tyranny Accountable

By Matthew Hayward

In the eternal battle between liberty and oppression, we must recognize the crucial roles that individuals, including those in public service, play in upholding or dismantling the chains of tyranny. We must also accept that sometimes, making those who enforce unjust rules uncomfortable might be the only way to tip the scales in favor of freedom. This is a path not of violence but of conviction, courage, and unwavering commitment to our rights.

The Discomfort of Enforcement

The concept of making enforcement more uncomfortable than refusal is not merely a theoretical idea but a practical tool we can wield in our struggle for liberty. Let's examine how this principle has been put into action:

Law Enforcement: A personal experience showed that standing firm against law enforcement led to their backing down. The public's general outrage and subtle suggestions about individual accountability and comparisons to the Nuremberg Trials and being armed created a situation where enforcement became more uncomfortable than refusal.

Regulatory Officials: During the pandemic, bureaucrats tasked with documenting businesses' violations found themselves targeted and exposed. The actions of citizens, who made these enforcers uncomfortable by using public records and nonviolent resistance, led to some officials refusing to continue their tasks. Liberty triumphed without harm being done.

Teachers and Education System: While specific examples may not be as prevalent, parents' growing outrage and active involvement at school board meetings signal a shift. The notion of holding individual teachers, not just the system, accountable for what many consider to be educational overreach or child abuse is gaining traction.

Nonviolent Resistance and Deterrence

Education and Mobilization: Our power begins with understanding our rights and inspiring others to join the cause.

Unite and Organize: Our collective voice is our strength. Together, we can change the course of history.

Visible Deterrence: When necessary, standing firm, even with the shadow of force, can serve as a peaceful yet powerful deterrent against those who would threaten our liberties.

Conclusion

Tyranny can only exist with compliance officers and foot soldiers. As we strive to preserve our freedoms, we must recognize that making those who enforce unjust laws more uncomfortable enforcing them than refusing can be a powerful tool. Pushing the blurry lines between freedom and authority, challenging the comfortable boundaries we've accepted, is where liberty shines brightest; this bold defiance reveals our true freedom. This is a path of conviction, not violence, a path that requires us to stand firm, unyielding, and unapologetic in our pursuit of liberty. Our actions, our voices, and our principles are our greatest weapons. We must wield them wisely for liberty's sake.



Labels:
Location: Olympia, WA, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...
Post a Comment
Read more

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...
Post a Comment
Read more

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...
1 comment
Read more