The State's Failure to the Free and the Silenced

By Matthew Hayward

In the land of liberty, a peculiar and troubling paradox exists. A citizen, once confined within the walls of a prison, is under the care and protection of the state. Upon release, they are thrust back into society, expected to fend for themselves, yet stripped of their fundamental rights to self-protection and participation in the democratic process.

The Second Amendment, a cornerstone of American freedom, is denied to many who have paid their debt to society. But the injustice doesn't end there. The right to vote, the very essence of a democratic society, is often withheld as well.

Imagine a bird, caged for years, finally set free but with clipped wings and a silenced song. Such is the plight of the released prisoner, expected to navigate life without the means to protect themselves or the voice to influence the society they rejoin.

The state's duty to protect does not end at the prison gate, nor does its obligation to uphold the principles of our Constitutional Republic. If a person is deemed unsafe or unready to have their rights, they should not be released. But if they are free, their rights must be fully restored.

The right to vote should not be suspended even if incarcerated. After all, the principles of a democratic system demand that every voice be heard, regardless of circumstance. To deny the vote is to silence a segment of the population, skewing the political landscape and undermining the very foundations of our great nation.

A Global Perspective:

In Canada, prisoners retain the right to vote, even while incarcerated. This policy aligns with the philosophy that the right to vote is fundamental and should not be denied.

Norway emphasizes rehabilitation and reintegration into society. Prisoners retain the right to vote, and there is a focus on preparing inmates for life after prison, including restoring rights.

These countries' policies reflect a more nuanced approach to prisoners' rights, recognizing the importance of both the right to self-protection and the right to participate in the democratic process. They may provide valuable examples for reform and align more closely with the principles that define our society.

The state must either restore the rights or assume responsibility for the safety and voice of those it has disarmed and silenced. Anything less is a betrayal of the principles upon which this great nation was founded.

Comments

The Heavy Toll of Reclaiming Freedom

By Matthew Hayward The struggle for freedom has been a recurring act in the grand theater of human history. Yet, there is a philosophical argument that once freedoms are lost, they are irretrievably gone. This perspective, while disheartening, merits exploration. It's a chilling echo of the words of the trailblazing libertarian Claire Wolfe, "America is at that awkward stage; it's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." The first act in this tragic play is the rise of technology. As we advance technologically, the tools of distraction become more potent. The Roman Coliseum has been replaced by the smartphone, a device that can pacify and distract with unprecedented efficiency. This technological pacification, while seemingly benign, has a sinister side. It diverts attention from the erosion of freedoms, making it easier for those in power to chip away at our liberties unnoticed. Consider the pervasive surveillance facilitated by our ...

How the Drug War Killed Liberty

By Matthew Hayward 10/25/2025 When the State Declares War on Behavior Earlier this month, President Trump ordered United States military strikes off the coast of Venezuela, killing alleged “narcoterrorists.” He later boasted, “ We’re just going to kill people that are bringing drugs into our country. ” Those words should chill every American who believes in liberty. Fifty years after Nixon declared his war on drugs, it has evolved from domestic raids to international executions, all under the same failed philosophy that government violence can cure human vice. When the state declares war on human behavior, it always loses and takes the people down with it. Every prison cell, every overdose, every cartel bullet is a monument to the arrogance of government trying to legislate morality. Back in 1988, Ron Paul said it best on The Morton Downey Jr. Show: “You can’t legislate morality. You can’t force people to be better by passing laws. If you want to solve moral and social problems, y...

The Quiet Surrender of Liberty

By Matthew Hayward The slow poison of complacency is the death of the fighting spirit. History is filled with examples of once-free people who gradually surrendered their liberty, not in a single stroke but through a series of quiet concessions. Tyranny often doesn’t arrive with the sound of thunder; it creeps in like a thief in the night, taking advantage of human complacency. The most maddening aspect of this process is not the power-hungry forces behind it, it is the passive, apathetic acceptance by the very people it seeks to control. Complacency is the death knell of liberty. It dulls the senses, erodes vigilance, and normalizes oppression over time. What once sparked outrage and resistance becomes routine, accepted as the new normal. The body scanners at TSA checkpoints, the Patriot Act, the ever-expanding surveillance state, each started with public protests and fiery debates. Now, these violations of privacy and freedom are woven into the fabric of everyday life. Why do pe...

Search This Blog