Skip to main content

Principle and Pragmatism: Navigating Political Waters

 By Matthew Hayward


In the intricate dance of political strategy, the story of Michele Caldier's 26th legislative campaign in 2014 serves as a compelling case study. Tasked with the formidable challenge of unseating a Democratic incumbent who had held the seat for 14 years, Caldier's campaign was a testament to the power of strategic pragmatism in action. Despite criticisms of her moderate stance, Caldier's consistent support for Republican leadership in the House underscores a nuanced understanding of political realities. An ideologue supporting a moderate is a strategic choice, prioritizing the advancement of broader political goals over strict ideological alignment.

This narrative is not merely about the outcomes of a single campaign but illuminates the broader implications of strategic voting in swing districts. My experience managing Caldier's campaign highlights the delicate balance between principle and pragmatism, a balance that is necessary in having success in the quest for political influence. While the Republicans subsequently lost the Senate and the other House seat in the 26th LD, Caldier's stance on leadership votes represents a strategic effort to maintain a foothold in the legislative process, an effort that underscores the importance of leadership in shaping the political landscape.

Morton Blackwell's wisdom, that we owe it to ourselves to learn to be more effective at advancing our principles, resonates deeply within this context. It's a reminder that the pursuit of political goals is not just about the passion of our convictions but also about the effectiveness of our strategies. Blackwell's teachings encourage us to view political engagement not just as a battlefield of ideologies but as a chess game of strategic moves and countermoves, where the effectiveness of our actions is measured by our ability to advance our principles within the framework of the political realities we face.

This approach to political engagement, characterized by a blend of ideological commitment and strategic pragmatism, offers a pathway to navigate the complexities of the political landscape. It challenges us to think critically about our choices, to weigh the implications of our actions, and to embrace the pragmatic decisions that can lead to the advancement of our principles. In the end, the journey of political engagement is as much about the strategies we employ as it is about the principles we hold dear.

Always remember, no matter what you choose, your most valuable and limited resource is time. There are a million causes and issues, and to effect change in any given one, there are infinite strategies and tactics. Choose wisely if you wish to exert your time and energy in a way that hopes to effect change. Sadly, most people exert themselves in ways that have little to no influence, their well-intended time, energies, and fortunes squandered.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...

Reality Is Rigged and You Can Hack It

By Matthew Hayward 7/29/2025 Manifesting Reality: How the Matrix, Quantum Entanglement, and Consciousness Intertwine Look, science fiction and science fact have been flirting for decades. But lately, the line between the two is starting to disappear. The idea that we’re living in a simulated reality isn’t just a late-night stoner theory anymore. It’s a framework, a lens to view those weird, unexplained moments that leave you thinking, "What the hell just happened?" Quantum entanglement, synchronicity, manifestation… they all start to make a lot more sense when you stop pretending reality is some rigid, mechanical machine. It’s not. It’s code. And if you’re paying attention, you might just figure out how to rewrite it. NPCs vs Manifestors: Who’s Really Running Things? Picture the world like a massive open-world video game. Some people are just running the default programming. They go to work, follow the script, consume what they’re told, and never ask questions. NPCs. Then the...