Skip to main content

Stand Up Before It's Too Late


When people make these lists with bankers and corrupt politicians, they are called terrorists, and they become subject to assassination themselves. Are they terrorists or patriots? Surely our founders would have been on our current government's watch lists; some perhaps on kill lists.

The government stopped declaring war over 50 years ago, now they use police actions, and the battlefield is everywhere. I don't know about you, but when bombs rain down, when no-fly zones are implemented, when trade is suffocated, spying, infiltration and data collection is happening, that's a declaration of war.

In America, our government has outlawed raw milk, set caps on small farms, criminalized small farming in some areas, set up checkpoints, spy on and collect data on virtually all Americans. Those of us who oppose the actions of the government are put on watch or potential threat lists, and some lists are claimed to be worthy of killing those on it without a trial. Maybe it's hard to find people guilty who have committed no crime. If it is a crime to fear government tyranny and the punishment for that crime is government tyranny, well then maybe it’s too late, maybe the Government has crossed the line and already declared war on its people.

As the gradual loss of liberty increases, many of us will instead focus on distractions and the liberties we do have. The question you must ask yourself is this: when is enough, enough? Where will you draw the line? If they raise your taxes 10%, if costs rise 10% if they put you on a no-fly list if they kill a friend of yours if they start making guns and ammunition difficult to attain? If you are no longer allowed to use your own land, maybe when growing your food becomes a crime? Or do you wait until your standard of living becomes precarious until you cannot fight back?

There is no better time than now to have a plan, own a gun and ammunition, talk to your friends, family, and neighbors, become independent and community strong. Ignore the Federal government...by force if necessary. I will not comply and if opting out means defending myself by force, then let it be known the aggressor is the one coming to my door with demands. If refusal to submit to authority is a crime, then you may as well try and arrest me now because I will not bow to an unjust authority. I have committed no crime but to demand my freedom.

Please stand with me; this is not a partisan matter, this is Liberty verse tyranny, freedom verse oppression, any citizen that bows down to an authority that attempts to violate your rights, might as well admit he/she is already a slave.





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...
1 comment
Read more

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...
Post a Comment
Read more

How the Drug War Killed Liberty

 By Matthew Hayward 10/25/2025 When the State Declares War on Behavior Earlier this month, President Trump ordered United States military strikes off the coast of Venezuela, killing alleged “narcoterrorists.” He later boasted, “ We’re just going to kill people that are bringing drugs into our country. ” Those words should chill every American who believes in liberty. Fifty years after Nixon declared his war on drugs, it has evolved from domestic raids to international executions, all under the same failed philosophy that government violence can cure human vice. When the state declares war on human behavior, it always loses and takes the people down with it. Every prison cell, every overdose, every cartel bullet is a monument to the arrogance of government trying to legislate morality. Back in 1988, Ron Paul said it best on The Morton Downey Jr. Show: “You can’t legislate morality. You can’t force people to be better by passing laws. If you want to solve moral and social problems, y...
Post a Comment
Read more