Skip to main content

A little history of the PNW and its vigilante past

By Matthew Hayward


Story #1

In the late 1800s, the town of Port Townsend, Washington, was plagued by corrupt officials who abused their power and stole from the people they were supposed to serve. Frustrated and outraged, a group of citizens known as the Port Townsend Regulators decided to take matters into their own hands. They saw themselves as defenders of justice and the common good, standing up to a corrupt government that had lost its way.


Too many people in Port Townsend and beyond, the Regulators were heroes who stood up to tyranny and fought for what was right. They were seen as fearless defenders of the people willing to risk their own safety to stand up to government corruption and abuse. The Regulators were praised for their courage, sense of justice, and willingness to take action when others would not.


The Regulators' most famous act was the burning down of the Jefferson County Courthouse and Jail in 1889. This dramatic action was a symbol of the Regulators' determination to put an end to the corrupt practices of the government. They believed that the courthouse and jail were symbols of government oppression and that burning them down would send a powerful message to the corrupt officials who had been using them to oppress the people.


While some people criticized the Regulators for their violent tactics, many others saw them as necessary and justified. They believed that the formal legal system had failed to address the corruption and abuse of power in Port Townsend and that the Regulators were filling a gap that the government had left. To these supporters, the Regulators were not vigilantes but rather citizen activists who were fighting for the greater good.


In the end, the Regulators were acquitted of the charges against them, and their actions were seen by many as a victory for popular justice and a warning about the dangers of government corruption and abuse of power. They had succeeded in drawing attention to the problems in Port Townsend's government and had forced a reckoning with the corrupt officials who had been causing so much harm.


Today, the legacy of the Port Townsend Regulators lives on as a reminder of the power of citizen action to bring about change. While their methods were controversial, their determination and commitment to justice continue inspiring people fighting against corruption and oppression in their communities. For those who saw them as heroes, the Regulators were a shining example of what can happen when ordinary people come together to fight for what is right. 





Story #2

The lynching of five men in Eagle, Idaho, in 1884 was one of the most notorious vigilante incidents in the history of the state. At the time, the town of Eagle was a small, isolated community in the southwest corner of Idaho, and it was reportedly controlled by a gang of outlaws known as the "Simon-Parker Gang."


The Simon-Parker Gang was believed to have killed several people in the area, including a prominent citizen named George Aiken. Despite the gang's reputation, the local law enforcement was reportedly corrupt and unwilling to act. This led a group of citizens to form a vigilante committee to deal with the gang themselves.


On the night of November 16, 1884, the vigilante committee, armed with rifles and shotguns, surrounded the home of the Simon-Parker Gang's leader, a man named Tom "Black Jack" Ketchum. The gang members put up a fight, but they were eventually overwhelmed, and five members of the gang were captured and taken into custody.


The vigilantes took the five men to a nearby field and hanged them from a large cottonwood tree. The bodies were left hanging there for several days as a warning to others who might challenge the authority of the vigilante committee.


The lynching of the Simon-Parker Gang was widely condemned at the time by local residents who believed in the rule of law and by the national press, which viewed the incident as a symptom of lawlessness in the American West. Nevertheless, the vigilante committee was never brought to trial, and the lynching remains a dark chapter in Idaho's history.




Story #3

The lynching of Sheriff James H. Logan took place on November 14, 1896, in Lewiston, Idaho. Logan had been elected sheriff in 1892 and was accused of various crimes, including corruption, embezzlement, and rape.


The rape allegation was made by a young woman named Lola Jensen, who claimed that Logan had assaulted her in his office. Logan denied the charges, and despite protests from citizens and the local press, he remained in office and continued to carry out his duties as sheriff.


On the night of November 13, a group of citizens stormed the jail where Logan was being held and took him into custody. The following morning, a mob estimated to number between 2,000 and 5,000 people gathered in the town square to witness the lynching.


Logan was taken to a telegraph pole, where he was tied up and beaten. The mob hoisted him up by a rope and hanged him from the pole. After his death, Logan's body was mutilated and dragged through the streets before being hung in effigy.


The lynching of Sheriff Logan was a significant event in Idaho's history and led to widespread condemnation of vigilante justice. It also highlighted the need for reform in the state's law enforcement system and helped spur efforts to create a more professional and accountable police force.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Grassroots Revolt Against GOP Elitism

By Matthew Hayward In the complex arena of political strategy, even those who occupy the highest echelons of power can falter, demonstrating a profound disconnect between their strategic intentions and operational execution. The recent failure to secure the endorsement for their preferred candidate, Dave Reichert, is not merely a setback; it is a revealing exposé of the grave strategic missteps at the heart of the Republican party's establishment in Washington State. These seasoned campaigners, these stewards of conservative strategy, have evidently underestimated the critical importance of grassroots engagement. While I acknowledge the logic behind promoting an established politician strategically positioned geographically and perceived as moderate in our swing state—a strategy driven by considerations of electability, which admittedly has its merits—the incessant focus on this argument and complete lack of any meaningful engagement and education has alienated the grassroots yet a...

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...

When the Census Goes Beyond the Constitution

 By Matthew Hayward The Census: From Counting People to Collecting Control The Constitution established the census as a straightforward tool for representation—nothing more, nothing less. Article I, Section 2 mandates an enumeration every ten years to determine how many representatives each state is allotted. That’s it. Simple. Effective. Proportional representation was the goal, and the census was designed to achieve it. So how did we end up here—with government agents asking about the number of bathrooms in our homes, our ethnic identities, and everything in between? This is the creeping hand of central planning at work. What began as a tool to empower individual representation has been twisted into a mechanism to empower bureaucrats, planners, and those who believe they know better than free individuals how to run their own lives. Central Planning: The False Promise of Data The justification for prying into the most intimate details of our lives is always the same: “We need the ...