Skip to main content

CBDCs will rise from the ashes

By Matthew Hayward


Once upon a time, in a not-too-distant future, a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) was introduced by the government of a powerful country. At first, people were excited about the convenience of making instant and secure transactions from their smartphones. However, as time passed, it became clear that the CBDC had some unexpected consequences.

The government began to use the CBDC to monitor people's spending habits and financial activities, creating a social credit score system that rewarded or punished citizens based on their behavior. People who spent money on government-approved items, such as healthy food and exercise equipment, received higher scores and access to better services, while those who spent money on "frivolous" items like video games or alcohol were penalized with lower scores and limited access to essential services.

As the government's control over the CBDC grew, people who spoke out against the regime found their funds frozen or seized by the government, effectively cutting them off from the financial system. Those who attempted to use alternative currencies, such as decentralized cryptocurrencies, were arrested and charged with financial crimes.

In response, a group of tech-savvy rebels began to develop their own decentralized cryptocurrency, using blockchain technology to create a currency that was beyond the control of any government or central authority. The decentralized cryptocurrency gained popularity among those who valued financial privacy and freedom, but the government was not content to let this new currency exist outside its control.

To regulate the decentralized cryptocurrency market, the government passed strict regulations that required all holders of decentralized cryptocurrency to undergo Know Your Customer (KYC) and AML anti-money laundering (AML) checks. The government also required that all transactions involving decentralized cryptocurrency be reported to the authorities for tax and regulatory purposes.

As the government's grip on the financial system tightened, dissenting voices were silenced, and those who continued to use decentralized cryptocurrency were hunted down and punished harshly. The rebellion against the government's control of the financial system was crushed, and the government's authority over the country became absolute.

In the end, the people realized too late the dangers of relying on centralized authority for their financial well-being. As they looked back on the rise and fall of the CBDC and the suppression of decentralized cryptocurrency, they realized that the price of freedom is eternal vigilance.




Labels:
Location: Olympia, WA, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...
Post a Comment
Read more

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...
1 comment
Read more

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...
Post a Comment
Read more