Skip to main content

From Duels to Assassinations: Central Banking and the Dark Side of American History

 By Matthew Hayward

As Americans, we often take our country's financial system for granted, assuming that institutions like the Federal Reserve, our nation's third central bank, are foundational fixtures meant to stabilize and strengthen our economy. Yet, this perception overlooks a critical aspect of American history—that the concept of a central bank has been a subject of contention since the inception of our republic. Our founding fathers, including figures like Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, harbored deep suspicions about central banking, viewing it as a potential menace to our liberty and democratic principles.

The truth is that the debate over the establishment of a central bank is as old as our nation itself. In fact, one of the earliest controversies in our country's history centered around this very issue. In the late 18th century, Alexander Hamilton, the first Secretary of the Treasury, pushed for the creation of a central bank to help stabilize the young nation's economy. However, many of his contemporaries, including Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, were deeply skeptical of this proposal.

They believed that a central bank would give too much power to a small group of elites and that it would be too easy for these elites to use that power to enrich themselves at the expense of the common people. They also worried that a central bank would create a system of debt and dependence that would be difficult to break free from.

In a letter to John Taylor in 1816, Jefferson wrote, "I sincerely believe...that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies." He argued that banks had the power to "undermine the honest industry of our citizens" and that the government could use them to "enslave" the people.

Madison was similarly distrustful of central banking. In a letter to Thomas Jefferson in 1791, he wrote, "History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance."

Despite these warnings, a central bank was established in the United States in 1913 with the creation of the Federal Reserve System. Since then, the Fed has played a central role in our economy, controlling interest rates, regulating banks, and managing the money supply.

But has it been a force for good? Many critics argue that the Fed has contributed to the growth of income inequality, the rise of debt, and the erosion of our individual freedoms. They point to the fact that the Fed's policies have led to the concentration of wealth in the hands of a small group of elites and that they have made it difficult for ordinary Americans to save for the future.

The debate over central banking has not always been a civil one. In fact, there have been instances of violence related to the issue. For example, in 1835, an assassination attempt was made on President Andrew Jackson after he vetoed a bill to recharter the Second Bank of the United States. And in 1804, Alexander Hamilton was killed in a duel with Vice President Aaron Burr, who strongly supported central banking.

As we celebrate the legacy of our founding fathers, let us remember their warnings about the dangers of central banking. Remember that they believed a strong and stable economy was built on the foundations of freedom, honesty, and hard work, not on the whims of a powerful few. And let us work to ensure that our financial system serves the best interests of all Americans, not just a select few.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Grassroots Revolt Against GOP Elitism

By Matthew Hayward In the complex arena of political strategy, even those who occupy the highest echelons of power can falter, demonstrating a profound disconnect between their strategic intentions and operational execution. The recent failure to secure the endorsement for their preferred candidate, Dave Reichert, is not merely a setback; it is a revealing exposé of the grave strategic missteps at the heart of the Republican party's establishment in Washington State. These seasoned campaigners, these stewards of conservative strategy, have evidently underestimated the critical importance of grassroots engagement. While I acknowledge the logic behind promoting an established politician strategically positioned geographically and perceived as moderate in our swing state—a strategy driven by considerations of electability, which admittedly has its merits—the incessant focus on this argument and complete lack of any meaningful engagement and education has alienated the grassroots yet a...

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...

When the Census Goes Beyond the Constitution

 By Matthew Hayward The Census: From Counting People to Collecting Control The Constitution established the census as a straightforward tool for representation—nothing more, nothing less. Article I, Section 2 mandates an enumeration every ten years to determine how many representatives each state is allotted. That’s it. Simple. Effective. Proportional representation was the goal, and the census was designed to achieve it. So how did we end up here—with government agents asking about the number of bathrooms in our homes, our ethnic identities, and everything in between? This is the creeping hand of central planning at work. What began as a tool to empower individual representation has been twisted into a mechanism to empower bureaucrats, planners, and those who believe they know better than free individuals how to run their own lives. Central Planning: The False Promise of Data The justification for prying into the most intimate details of our lives is always the same: “We need the ...