Skip to main content

From Duels to Assassinations: Central Banking and the Dark Side of American History

 By Matthew Hayward

As Americans, we often take our country's financial system for granted, assuming that institutions like the Federal Reserve, our nation's third central bank, are foundational fixtures meant to stabilize and strengthen our economy. Yet, this perception overlooks a critical aspect of American history—that the concept of a central bank has been a subject of contention since the inception of our republic. Our founding fathers, including figures like Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, harbored deep suspicions about central banking, viewing it as a potential menace to our liberty and democratic principles.

The truth is that the debate over the establishment of a central bank is as old as our nation itself. In fact, one of the earliest controversies in our country's history centered around this very issue. In the late 18th century, Alexander Hamilton, the first Secretary of the Treasury, pushed for the creation of a central bank to help stabilize the young nation's economy. However, many of his contemporaries, including Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, were deeply skeptical of this proposal.

They believed that a central bank would give too much power to a small group of elites and that it would be too easy for these elites to use that power to enrich themselves at the expense of the common people. They also worried that a central bank would create a system of debt and dependence that would be difficult to break free from.

In a letter to John Taylor in 1816, Jefferson wrote, "I sincerely believe...that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies." He argued that banks had the power to "undermine the honest industry of our citizens" and that the government could use them to "enslave" the people.

Madison was similarly distrustful of central banking. In a letter to Thomas Jefferson in 1791, he wrote, "History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance."

Despite these warnings, a central bank was established in the United States in 1913 with the creation of the Federal Reserve System. Since then, the Fed has played a central role in our economy, controlling interest rates, regulating banks, and managing the money supply.

But has it been a force for good? Many critics argue that the Fed has contributed to the growth of income inequality, the rise of debt, and the erosion of our individual freedoms. They point to the fact that the Fed's policies have led to the concentration of wealth in the hands of a small group of elites and that they have made it difficult for ordinary Americans to save for the future.

The debate over central banking has not always been a civil one. In fact, there have been instances of violence related to the issue. For example, in 1835, an assassination attempt was made on President Andrew Jackson after he vetoed a bill to recharter the Second Bank of the United States. And in 1804, Alexander Hamilton was killed in a duel with Vice President Aaron Burr, who strongly supported central banking.

As we celebrate the legacy of our founding fathers, let us remember their warnings about the dangers of central banking. Remember that they believed a strong and stable economy was built on the foundations of freedom, honesty, and hard work, not on the whims of a powerful few. And let us work to ensure that our financial system serves the best interests of all Americans, not just a select few.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...