Skip to main content

His last speech on Fox News before being fired

In his final appearance on Fox News in 2012, Judge Napolitano, host of "Freedom Watch," delivered an impassioned monologue - a powerful critique of the state of our nation's freedoms and liberties. This potent discourse, rich with thought-provoking questions about the balance of power within our government, the sanctity of individual rights, and the authenticity of our Republican form of government, proved to be his swan song on the network before his abrupt dismissal. Since then, this speech has emerged as a guiding light for those seeking to unravel the intricacies of our constitutional rights and as a clarion call for those determined to safeguard these rights. Here lies that speech, in its unfiltered form, as resonant now as it ever was:

Freedom Watch with Judge Napolitano's "The Plain Truth" aired on FOX NEWS in 2012.

"Dose the government works for us, or do we work for the government? Tonight, what if the Constitution no longer applied? 

What if the whole purpose of the Constitution was to limit the government? 

What if Congress's enumerated powers in the Constitution no longer limited Congress but were actually used as a justification to extend Congress's authority over every realm of human life?  

What if the President, meant to be an equal to Congress, has become instead a Democratically elected term-limited Monarch? 

What if the president assumed everything he did was legal just because he is the president? 

What if he could interrupt your regularly scheduled radio and T.V. programming for a special message from him? 

What if he could declare war on his own? 

What if he could read your emails and your texts without a search warrant? 

What if he could kill you without warning? 

What if Supreme Court justices no longer look to the Constitution to determine the constitutionality of a law but rather simply to what Justice who preceded them thought about it? 

What if the rights and principles guaranteed in the Constitution have been so distorted in the past 200 years as to be unrecognizable by the founders? 

What if the 50 states were no longer sovereign entities equal to each other and parents of the federal government they voluntarily constituted? 

What if the states were mere provinces of a totally nationalized and fully centralized government? 

What if the Constitution was amended stealthily, not by Constitutional amendments duly ratified by the states but by the constant and persistent expansion of the federal government's role in our lives. 

What if the federal government decided if its own powers were proper and constitutional? 

What if the Constitution were no longer the supreme law of the land? 

What if you needed a license from the government to speak, to assemble, or to protest against the government? 

What if the government didn't like what you plan to say, so it didn't give you the license? 

What if the right to keep and bear arms only applied to the government? 

What if  Posse Comitatus, the federal law that prohibits our military from occupying our streets, were no longer in effect? 

What if the government considered the military and adequate dispenser of domestic lawenformcent?

What if cops looked and acted like troops, and you couldn't distinguish the military from the police?

What if you were not secure in your person, in your papers, and in your property?

What if federal agents could write their own search warrants and defiance of the Constitution?

What if the government could decide when you were and when you we're not entitled to a jury trial?

What if the government could take your property whenever it wanted?

What if the government could continue prosecuting you until it got the verdict it wanted?

What if the government could force you to testify against yourself simply by labeling you a domestic terrorist?

What if the government could torture you until you said what the government wanted to hear?

What if people running for president actually supported torture

What if the government tortured your children to get to you?

What if government judges and government lawyers intimidated juries into convicting the innocent?

What if the government could send you to your death and your innocence meant nothing so long as the government's procedures were followed?

What if America's prison population, the largest in the world, was a cruel and unusual way for a country to be free?

What if half the prison population never harmed anyone but themselves?

What if the people had no rights except those the government shows to let them have?

What if the states had no rights except to do is the federal government commanded?

What if our elected didn't really live among us, but instead, all had their hearts and in Washington DC

What if the government could strip you of your rights because of where your mother was when you were born?

What if the income tax was unconstitutional? 

What if the states were convinced to give up their representation in Congress?

What if the government tried to ban you from using a substance in your body that is older than the government itself?

What if voting didn't mean anything anymore because both political parties stand for big government?

What if the government could write any law regulate any behavior and tax any event the Consituion be damned?

What if the government was the reason we don't have a constitution anymore?

What if you could love your country but hate what the government has done to it ?

What if sometimes to love your country you had to alter or abolish the government? 

What if Jefferson was right?

What if that government is best which governs least?

What if I'm right? 

What if the government is wrong?

What if it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong?

What if it is better to perish fighting for freedom than to live as a slave? 

What if freedom's greatest hour of danger is now?"





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Grassroots Revolt Against GOP Elitism

By Matthew Hayward In the complex arena of political strategy, even those who occupy the highest echelons of power can falter, demonstrating a profound disconnect between their strategic intentions and operational execution. The recent failure to secure the endorsement for their preferred candidate, Dave Reichert, is not merely a setback; it is a revealing exposé of the grave strategic missteps at the heart of the Republican party's establishment in Washington State. These seasoned campaigners, these stewards of conservative strategy, have evidently underestimated the critical importance of grassroots engagement. While I acknowledge the logic behind promoting an established politician strategically positioned geographically and perceived as moderate in our swing state—a strategy driven by considerations of electability, which admittedly has its merits—the incessant focus on this argument and complete lack of any meaningful engagement and education has alienated the grassroots yet a...

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...

When the Census Goes Beyond the Constitution

 By Matthew Hayward The Census: From Counting People to Collecting Control The Constitution established the census as a straightforward tool for representation—nothing more, nothing less. Article I, Section 2 mandates an enumeration every ten years to determine how many representatives each state is allotted. That’s it. Simple. Effective. Proportional representation was the goal, and the census was designed to achieve it. So how did we end up here—with government agents asking about the number of bathrooms in our homes, our ethnic identities, and everything in between? This is the creeping hand of central planning at work. What began as a tool to empower individual representation has been twisted into a mechanism to empower bureaucrats, planners, and those who believe they know better than free individuals how to run their own lives. Central Planning: The False Promise of Data The justification for prying into the most intimate details of our lives is always the same: “We need the ...