Skip to main content

His last speech on Fox News before being fired

In his final appearance on Fox News in 2012, Judge Napolitano, host of "Freedom Watch," delivered an impassioned monologue - a powerful critique of the state of our nation's freedoms and liberties. This potent discourse, rich with thought-provoking questions about the balance of power within our government, the sanctity of individual rights, and the authenticity of our Republican form of government, proved to be his swan song on the network before his abrupt dismissal. Since then, this speech has emerged as a guiding light for those seeking to unravel the intricacies of our constitutional rights and as a clarion call for those determined to safeguard these rights. Here lies that speech, in its unfiltered form, as resonant now as it ever was:

Freedom Watch with Judge Napolitano's "The Plain Truth" aired on FOX NEWS in 2012.

"Dose the government works for us, or do we work for the government? Tonight, what if the Constitution no longer applied? 

What if the whole purpose of the Constitution was to limit the government? 

What if Congress's enumerated powers in the Constitution no longer limited Congress but were actually used as a justification to extend Congress's authority over every realm of human life?  

What if the President, meant to be an equal to Congress, has become instead a Democratically elected term-limited Monarch? 

What if the president assumed everything he did was legal just because he is the president? 

What if he could interrupt your regularly scheduled radio and T.V. programming for a special message from him? 

What if he could declare war on his own? 

What if he could read your emails and your texts without a search warrant? 

What if he could kill you without warning? 

What if Supreme Court justices no longer look to the Constitution to determine the constitutionality of a law but rather simply to what Justice who preceded them thought about it? 

What if the rights and principles guaranteed in the Constitution have been so distorted in the past 200 years as to be unrecognizable by the founders? 

What if the 50 states were no longer sovereign entities equal to each other and parents of the federal government they voluntarily constituted? 

What if the states were mere provinces of a totally nationalized and fully centralized government? 

What if the Constitution was amended stealthily, not by Constitutional amendments duly ratified by the states but by the constant and persistent expansion of the federal government's role in our lives. 

What if the federal government decided if its own powers were proper and constitutional? 

What if the Constitution were no longer the supreme law of the land? 

What if you needed a license from the government to speak, to assemble, or to protest against the government? 

What if the government didn't like what you plan to say, so it didn't give you the license? 

What if the right to keep and bear arms only applied to the government? 

What if  Posse Comitatus, the federal law that prohibits our military from occupying our streets, were no longer in effect? 

What if the government considered the military and adequate dispenser of domestic lawenformcent?

What if cops looked and acted like troops, and you couldn't distinguish the military from the police?

What if you were not secure in your person, in your papers, and in your property?

What if federal agents could write their own search warrants and defiance of the Constitution?

What if the government could decide when you were and when you we're not entitled to a jury trial?

What if the government could take your property whenever it wanted?

What if the government could continue prosecuting you until it got the verdict it wanted?

What if the government could force you to testify against yourself simply by labeling you a domestic terrorist?

What if the government could torture you until you said what the government wanted to hear?

What if people running for president actually supported torture

What if the government tortured your children to get to you?

What if government judges and government lawyers intimidated juries into convicting the innocent?

What if the government could send you to your death and your innocence meant nothing so long as the government's procedures were followed?

What if America's prison population, the largest in the world, was a cruel and unusual way for a country to be free?

What if half the prison population never harmed anyone but themselves?

What if the people had no rights except those the government shows to let them have?

What if the states had no rights except to do is the federal government commanded?

What if our elected didn't really live among us, but instead, all had their hearts and in Washington DC

What if the government could strip you of your rights because of where your mother was when you were born?

What if the income tax was unconstitutional? 

What if the states were convinced to give up their representation in Congress?

What if the government tried to ban you from using a substance in your body that is older than the government itself?

What if voting didn't mean anything anymore because both political parties stand for big government?

What if the government could write any law regulate any behavior and tax any event the Consituion be damned?

What if the government was the reason we don't have a constitution anymore?

What if you could love your country but hate what the government has done to it ?

What if sometimes to love your country you had to alter or abolish the government? 

What if Jefferson was right?

What if that government is best which governs least?

What if I'm right? 

What if the government is wrong?

What if it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong?

What if it is better to perish fighting for freedom than to live as a slave? 

What if freedom's greatest hour of danger is now?"





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...