Skip to main content

The Dangers of Control: Lessons from History

 By Matthew Hayward

Throughout history, countless examples of governments and other entities have attempted to exert control over populations. The results have often been disastrous, whether through gun control laws, censorship, or other means. Here are just a few historical examples that demonstrate control's dangers.

The Armenian Genocide: During World War I, the Ottoman Empire carried out a genocide against its Armenian population. The government disarmed Armenians and other minority groups before the massacre, making it easier for the government to carry out the genocide.

Black Slavery: For centuries, slave owners in the United States and other countries used force and control to maintain their power over enslaved people. Slaves were often denied the right to bear arms or any other means of defending themselves, making it easier for their oppressors to maintain control.

Soviet Terror Famine: In the 1930s, the Soviet government carried out a famine, (in a country I cannot mention because of Google Ad Sense rules) that killed millions of people. The government used control over food supplies and the media to maintain its power and suppress any opposition.

Rape of Nanking: During World War II, Japanese soldiers massacred Chinese civilians in the city of Nanking. The soldiers used their control over the population to carry out mass rape, torture, and murder.

Communist Chinese Death Regime: Under the leadership of Mao Zedong, the Chinese government carried out numerous atrocities, including the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution. The government used control over information and communication to suppress dissent and maintain its power.

Cambodian Genocide: The Khmer Rouge government of Cambodia carried out a genocide against its own people in the 1970s. The government used control over food, transportation, and communication to maintain its power and suppress any opposition.

These are just a few examples of the dangers of control. In each case, the government or other entity used control over the population to maintain its power and suppress dissent. The results were often disastrous, with millions of people losing their lives.

Today, we continue to see examples of governments and other entities attempting to exert control over populations. Whether through gun control laws, censorship, or other means, these attempts at control are dangerous and must be resisted.

We must always be vigilant against those who would use control to maintain their power. We must stand up for our rights and freedoms and work to create a society where everyone is able to live free from oppression and control. Only by learning from the lessons of history can we hope to create a better future for ourselves and future generations.



Preventing a single genocide has the power to save more lives than eliminating all accidental deaths and murders combined for the last thousand years. The cost of allowing control to triumph over compassion is simply too high.

If those who say 'if it saves just one life' truly believe in the value of a single life, then surely they would agree that preventing even one genocide is worth fighting for.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...