The Dangers of Control: Lessons from History

By Matthew Hayward

Throughout history, countless examples of governments and other entities have attempted to exert control over populations. The results have often been disastrous, whether through gun control laws, censorship, or other means. Here are just a few historical examples that demonstrate control's dangers.

The Armenian Genocide: During World War I, the Ottoman Empire carried out a genocide against its Armenian population. The government disarmed Armenians and other minority groups before the massacre, making it easier for the government to carry out the genocide.

Black Slavery: For centuries, slave owners in the United States and other countries used force and control to maintain their power over enslaved people. Slaves were often denied the right to bear arms or any other means of defending themselves, making it easier for their oppressors to maintain control.

Soviet Terror Famine: In the 1930s, the Soviet government carried out a famine, (in a country I cannot mention because of Google Ad Sense rules) that killed millions of people. The government used control over food supplies and the media to maintain its power and suppress any opposition.

Rape of Nanking: During World War II, Japanese soldiers massacred Chinese civilians in the city of Nanking. The soldiers used their control over the population to carry out mass rape, torture, and murder.

Communist Chinese Death Regime: Under the leadership of Mao Zedong, the Chinese government carried out numerous atrocities, including the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution. The government used control over information and communication to suppress dissent and maintain its power.

Cambodian Genocide: The Khmer Rouge government of Cambodia carried out a genocide against its own people in the 1970s. The government used control over food, transportation, and communication to maintain its power and suppress any opposition.

These are just a few examples of the dangers of control. In each case, the government or other entity used control over the population to maintain its power and suppress dissent. The results were often disastrous, with millions of people losing their lives.

Today, we continue to see examples of governments and other entities attempting to exert control over populations. Whether through gun control laws, censorship, or other means, these attempts at control are dangerous and must be resisted.

We must always be vigilant against those who would use control to maintain their power. We must stand up for our rights and freedoms and work to create a society where everyone is able to live free from oppression and control. Only by learning from the lessons of history can we hope to create a better future for ourselves and future generations.

Preventing a single genocide has the power to save more lives than eliminating all accidental deaths and murders combined for the last thousand years. The cost of allowing control to triumph over compassion is simply too high.

If those who say 'if it saves just one life' truly believe in the value of a single life, then surely they would agree that preventing even one genocide is worth fighting for.

How the Drug War Killed Liberty

By Matthew Hayward 10/25/2025 When the State Declares War on Behavior Earlier this month, President Trump ordered United States military strikes off the coast of Venezuela, killing alleged “narcoterrorists.” He later boasted, “ We’re just going to kill people that are bringing drugs into our country. ” Those words should chill every American who believes in liberty. Fifty years after Nixon declared his war on drugs, it has evolved from domestic raids to international executions, all under the same failed philosophy that government violence can cure human vice. When the state declares war on human behavior, it always loses and takes the people down with it. Every prison cell, every overdose, every cartel bullet is a monument to the arrogance of government trying to legislate morality. Back in 1988, Ron Paul said it best on The Morton Downey Jr. Show: “You can’t legislate morality. You can’t force people to be better by passing laws. If you want to solve moral and social problems, y...

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

By Matthew Hayward 9/19/2025 The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning. This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement. Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...

The Quiet Surrender of Liberty

By Matthew Hayward The slow poison of complacency is the death of the fighting spirit. History is filled with examples of once-free people who gradually surrendered their liberty, not in a single stroke but through a series of quiet concessions. Tyranny often doesn’t arrive with the sound of thunder; it creeps in like a thief in the night, taking advantage of human complacency. The most maddening aspect of this process is not the power-hungry forces behind it, it is the passive, apathetic acceptance by the very people it seeks to control. Complacency is the death knell of liberty. It dulls the senses, erodes vigilance, and normalizes oppression over time. What once sparked outrage and resistance becomes routine, accepted as the new normal. The body scanners at TSA checkpoints, the Patriot Act, the ever-expanding surveillance state, each started with public protests and fiery debates. Now, these violations of privacy and freedom are woven into the fabric of everyday life. Why do pe...

Search This Blog