Skip to main content

The Dangers of Control: Lessons from History

 By Matthew Hayward

Throughout history, countless examples of governments and other entities have attempted to exert control over populations. The results have often been disastrous, whether through gun control laws, censorship, or other means. Here are just a few historical examples that demonstrate control's dangers.

The Armenian Genocide: During World War I, the Ottoman Empire carried out a genocide against its Armenian population. The government disarmed Armenians and other minority groups before the massacre, making it easier for the government to carry out the genocide.

Black Slavery: For centuries, slave owners in the United States and other countries used force and control to maintain their power over enslaved people. Slaves were often denied the right to bear arms or any other means of defending themselves, making it easier for their oppressors to maintain control.

Soviet Terror Famine: In the 1930s, the Soviet government carried out a famine, (in a country I cannot mention because of Google Ad Sense rules) that killed millions of people. The government used control over food supplies and the media to maintain its power and suppress any opposition.

Rape of Nanking: During World War II, Japanese soldiers massacred Chinese civilians in the city of Nanking. The soldiers used their control over the population to carry out mass rape, torture, and murder.

Communist Chinese Death Regime: Under the leadership of Mao Zedong, the Chinese government carried out numerous atrocities, including the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution. The government used control over information and communication to suppress dissent and maintain its power.

Cambodian Genocide: The Khmer Rouge government of Cambodia carried out a genocide against its own people in the 1970s. The government used control over food, transportation, and communication to maintain its power and suppress any opposition.

These are just a few examples of the dangers of control. In each case, the government or other entity used control over the population to maintain its power and suppress dissent. The results were often disastrous, with millions of people losing their lives.

Today, we continue to see examples of governments and other entities attempting to exert control over populations. Whether through gun control laws, censorship, or other means, these attempts at control are dangerous and must be resisted.

We must always be vigilant against those who would use control to maintain their power. We must stand up for our rights and freedoms and work to create a society where everyone is able to live free from oppression and control. Only by learning from the lessons of history can we hope to create a better future for ourselves and future generations.



Preventing a single genocide has the power to save more lives than eliminating all accidental deaths and murders combined for the last thousand years. The cost of allowing control to triumph over compassion is simply too high.

If those who say 'if it saves just one life' truly believe in the value of a single life, then surely they would agree that preventing even one genocide is worth fighting for.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Grassroots Revolt Against GOP Elitism

By Matthew Hayward In the complex arena of political strategy, even those who occupy the highest echelons of power can falter, demonstrating a profound disconnect between their strategic intentions and operational execution. The recent failure to secure the endorsement for their preferred candidate, Dave Reichert, is not merely a setback; it is a revealing exposé of the grave strategic missteps at the heart of the Republican party's establishment in Washington State. These seasoned campaigners, these stewards of conservative strategy, have evidently underestimated the critical importance of grassroots engagement. While I acknowledge the logic behind promoting an established politician strategically positioned geographically and perceived as moderate in our swing state—a strategy driven by considerations of electability, which admittedly has its merits—the incessant focus on this argument and complete lack of any meaningful engagement and education has alienated the grassroots yet a...

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...

When the Census Goes Beyond the Constitution

 By Matthew Hayward The Census: From Counting People to Collecting Control The Constitution established the census as a straightforward tool for representation—nothing more, nothing less. Article I, Section 2 mandates an enumeration every ten years to determine how many representatives each state is allotted. That’s it. Simple. Effective. Proportional representation was the goal, and the census was designed to achieve it. So how did we end up here—with government agents asking about the number of bathrooms in our homes, our ethnic identities, and everything in between? This is the creeping hand of central planning at work. What began as a tool to empower individual representation has been twisted into a mechanism to empower bureaucrats, planners, and those who believe they know better than free individuals how to run their own lives. Central Planning: The False Promise of Data The justification for prying into the most intimate details of our lives is always the same: “We need the ...