Gradualism in Politics: The Consequences of Ignoring the Constitutional Amendment Process

By Matthew Hayward

Gradualism, also known as incrementalism, is an approach in politics where policies or changes are implemented gradually, leading to significant transformations over time. Although this approach has merits in some contexts, it can pose a danger to a Republic when it undermines the constitutional amendment process. Drawing on the wisdom of George Washington and considering specific examples, this blog will emphasize the importance of adhering to the Constitution and its amendment process while examining the consequences of gradualism in politics.

Gradualism and the Constitution

The Constitution serves as the foundational document of the United States, providing a blueprint for governance and safeguarding citizens' rights. Gradualism, however, can threaten the Constitution's relevance, as it allows politicians to bypass its provisions to achieve their objectives. Through gradual policy changes, politicians can circumvent the constitutional amendment process and erode individual liberties, contravening the principles upon which the United States was founded.

George Washington wisely said, "If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this may be the instrument of good in one instance, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed."

The Dangers of Gradualism

A significant danger of gradualism in politics is the expansion of government power, often achieved through incremental steps, which can encroach on citizens' rights and diminish their freedom. Gradualism enables politicians to make small changes that, when considered individually, may seem harmless. However, the cumulative effect of these changes may ultimately infringe on constitutional rights.

A specific example of this can be seen in the expansion of war powers. Over time, the executive branch has gradually assumed more authority over military actions, often without congressional approval. This shift in power undermines the Constitution's original intent to balance war-making authority between the executive and legislative branches, weakening the checks and balances system.

Another example is the prohibition of alcohol in the United States. The 18th Amendment, which was later repealed by the 21st Amendment, demonstrated the constitutional amendment process at work. Although the amendment had unintended consequences, such as organized crime, corruption, and public health issues, it exemplified the correct legal path for addressing issues on a constitutional level.

Ignoring the Constitutional Amendment Process

By sidestepping the constitutional amendment process, gradualism undermines the democratic principles that the United States was built upon. It allows politicians to make changes without the requisite consensus, which can erode the rights and liberties the Constitution was designed to protect. Gradualism also risks creating an environment where political expediency and personal agendas take precedence over preserving the Constitution and the rule of law.

Conclusion

Gradualism or incrementalism may seem like a pragmatic approach to politics, but it can have severe consequences when it ignores the constitutional amendment process. The wisdom of George Washington serves as a reminder of the importance of adhering to the Constitution and its amendment process. By resisting the temptation to bypass the amendment process through incremental changes, politicians can engage in the difficult but necessary work of building consensus and ensuring that any alterations to the Constitution reflect the people's will. Adhering to the constitutional amendment process is crucial in maintaining the democratic principles upon which the United States was founded.