Skip to main content

Don't just celebrate Independence Day - Embrace and Defend It

By Matthew Hayward

A Statement of Independence and Sovereignty

Every year, as the 4th of July rolls around, we are reminded of the spirit of independence and the values that our great nation was built upon. For many, it's a day of barbecues, fireworks, and family gatherings. For others, it's a day of reflection on the principles of freedom and liberty that define the United States. For me, it's a day to express my beliefs uniquely and personally.

For over a decade, I have upheld a tradition that may seem unconventional to some, but it's a powerful symbol of my commitment to national and state sovereignty. Every 4th of July, I burn the United Nations flag. This act is not born out of disrespect or malice, but rather, it's a statement that we are not the United Nations; we are the United States.

Before this tradition, I would publicly read the Declaration of Independence, a document that encapsulates the essence of our nation's spirit. However, I felt the need to express my sentiments in a more tangible way. Hence, the tradition of burning the UN flag was born.

To me, the UN flag represents the idea of a one-world government, which undermines individual nations' sovereignty. While the UN's goal of world peace is noble, its execution has often been questionable, and in some cases, it has even contributed to atrocities. Furthermore, the UN has been a source of numerous ideas that I find troubling, such as Agenda 21, which I believe erodes personal liberty and undermines our sovereignty.

I am an individualist, not a collectivist. I believe in the principles of individual liberty, private property, free-market capitalism, and local sovereignty. The idea of a global body dictating policies for our country is something I cannot support. While elected officials are free to make any policy decisions they deem fit, it is deeply concerning when American policy seems to be influenced by a foreign political body. This concern is particularly heightened when the foreign entity serves an ideology that is at odds with our core values of national sovereignty.

Despite my strong feelings about the UN, I am a staunch supporter of free speech. Burning a flag, whether it's the UN's or our own, is a form of expression that should be protected. As Aldous Huxley said, "I don’t want comfort. I want God, I want poetry, I want real danger, I want freedom, I want goodness. I want sin." I love this country and that people have the right to express their beliefs, even if they may upset others.

My 4th of July tradition is a personal expression of my beliefs. It's a reminder of the values that our nation was built upon and a statement against the erosion of our sovereignty. As we celebrate this Independence Day, let's remember the principles that make our country great and continue to uphold our rights to freedom and liberty.


A Day In The Park

Comments

  1. Great tradition for all the right reasons!

    ReplyDelete
  2. You are spot on-----except you don't seem to see that the entire "global" or One World Government is a strong and Satanic movement that has been operating for over 100 years in this country-----it just started to get traction after United Nations Agenda 21 was spawned back in 1990. The "One Worlders use the Trojan Horse reason of "peace" to form a world government, but that is a lie ------ all smoke and mirrors. What they really are after is international treaties, which overrule any nation's constitution. They want to control your health care, your bank account, where you live, what you drive, where you will work, and make everyone get the jab. What is the real goal? TOTALTARISM.

    We will be the slaves, the workers, and we will do whatever they command because they will have gained control of our bodies, our healthcare, our freedom to assemble, to speak and to travel. In short, they will control us thru outward circumstances.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...