Independence Day: A Reflection on Patriots, Traitors, and the Outcome of War

By Matthew Hayward

As we approach another Independence day, the Fourth of July, it's essential to reflect on the significance of this day and the complex history it represents. The Fourth of July is not just about fireworks, barbecues, and parades; it's a celebration of the birth of American independence, a tribute to the individuals who risked everything for the ideals they believed in.

In the historical context, the Founding Fathers were indeed traitors to the British Crown. They rebelled against their government, broke the laws of the time, and led a revolution. Yet, we don't remember them as traitors. We remember them as patriots, as heroes. Why? Because they won. Their victory in the Revolutionary War not only gave birth to a new nation but also redefined their legacy.

This raises an intriguing question about the nature of patriotism and treason. Are these labels inherently about our actions, or are they more about the outcomes? Can a traitor be a patriot, and vice versa, depending on who writes the history?

The Fourth of July is a day to ponder these questions. It's a day to honor the sacrifices made for our freedoms and to acknowledge the complexities of our history. It's a day to remember that the labels of "patriot" and "traitor" are often a matter of perspective, heavily influenced by the outcome of the conflict.

As we celebrate this Fourth of July, let's not forget the nuanced history behind our independence. Let's remember that our nation was born out of an act of treason that we now celebrate as an act of patriotism. And let's commit ourselves to understanding our history in all its complexity, for it is only through understanding our past that we can navigate our future.

My badass daughter, Lilly Clarke, soon to be army National guard Sergeant Clarke.

Comments

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

By Matthew Hayward 9/19/2025 The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning. This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement. Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...

Search This Blog