Independence Day: A Reflection on Patriots, Traitors, and the Outcome of War

By Matthew Hayward

As we approach another Independence day, the Fourth of July, it's essential to reflect on the significance of this day and the complex history it represents. The Fourth of July is not just about fireworks, barbecues, and parades; it's a celebration of the birth of American independence, a tribute to the individuals who risked everything for the ideals they believed in.

In the historical context, the Founding Fathers were indeed traitors to the British Crown. They rebelled against their government, broke the laws of the time, and led a revolution. Yet, we don't remember them as traitors. We remember them as patriots, as heroes. Why? Because they won. Their victory in the Revolutionary War not only gave birth to a new nation but also redefined their legacy.

This raises an intriguing question about the nature of patriotism and treason. Are these labels inherently about our actions, or are they more about the outcomes? Can a traitor be a patriot, and vice versa, depending on who writes the history?

The Fourth of July is a day to ponder these questions. It's a day to honor the sacrifices made for our freedoms and to acknowledge the complexities of our history. It's a day to remember that the labels of "patriot" and "traitor" are often a matter of perspective, heavily influenced by the outcome of the conflict.

As we celebrate this Fourth of July, let's not forget the nuanced history behind our independence. Let's remember that our nation was born out of an act of treason that we now celebrate as an act of patriotism. And let's commit ourselves to understanding our history in all its complexity, for it is only through understanding our past that we can navigate our future.

My badass daughter, Lilly Clarke, soon to be army National guard Sergeant Clarke.

Comments

Grassroots Revolt Against GOP Elitism

By Matthew Hayward In the complex arena of political strategy, even those who occupy the highest echelons of power can falter, demonstrating a profound disconnect between their strategic intentions and operational execution. The recent failure to secure the endorsement for their preferred candidate, Dave Reichert, is not merely a setback; it is a revealing exposé of the grave strategic missteps at the heart of the Republican party's establishment in Washington State. These seasoned campaigners, these stewards of conservative strategy, have evidently underestimated the critical importance of grassroots engagement. While I acknowledge the logic behind promoting an established politician strategically positioned geographically and perceived as moderate in our swing state—a strategy driven by considerations of electability, which admittedly has its merits—the incessant focus on this argument and complete lack of any meaningful engagement and education has alienated the grassroots yet a...

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...

When the Census Goes Beyond the Constitution

By Matthew Hayward The Census: From Counting People to Collecting Control The Constitution established the census as a straightforward tool for representation—nothing more, nothing less. Article I, Section 2 mandates an enumeration every ten years to determine how many representatives each state is allotted. That’s it. Simple. Effective. Proportional representation was the goal, and the census was designed to achieve it. So how did we end up here—with government agents asking about the number of bathrooms in our homes, our ethnic identities, and everything in between? This is the creeping hand of central planning at work. What began as a tool to empower individual representation has been twisted into a mechanism to empower bureaucrats, planners, and those who believe they know better than free individuals how to run their own lives. Central Planning: The False Promise of Data The justification for prying into the most intimate details of our lives is always the same: “We need the ...

Search This Blog