Independence Day: A Reflection on Patriots, Traitors, and the Outcome of War

By Matthew Hayward

As we approach another Independence day, the Fourth of July, it's essential to reflect on the significance of this day and the complex history it represents. The Fourth of July is not just about fireworks, barbecues, and parades; it's a celebration of the birth of American independence, a tribute to the individuals who risked everything for the ideals they believed in.

In the historical context, the Founding Fathers were indeed traitors to the British Crown. They rebelled against their government, broke the laws of the time, and led a revolution. Yet, we don't remember them as traitors. We remember them as patriots, as heroes. Why? Because they won. Their victory in the Revolutionary War not only gave birth to a new nation but also redefined their legacy.

This raises an intriguing question about the nature of patriotism and treason. Are these labels inherently about our actions, or are they more about the outcomes? Can a traitor be a patriot, and vice versa, depending on who writes the history?

The Fourth of July is a day to ponder these questions. It's a day to honor the sacrifices made for our freedoms and to acknowledge the complexities of our history. It's a day to remember that the labels of "patriot" and "traitor" are often a matter of perspective, heavily influenced by the outcome of the conflict.

As we celebrate this Fourth of July, let's not forget the nuanced history behind our independence. Let's remember that our nation was born out of an act of treason that we now celebrate as an act of patriotism. And let's commit ourselves to understanding our history in all its complexity, for it is only through understanding our past that we can navigate our future.

My badass daughter, Lilly Clarke, soon to be army National guard Sergeant Clarke.

Comments

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

By Matthew Hayward 9/19/2025 The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning. This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement. Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...

Reality Is Rigged and You Can Hack It

By Matthew Hayward 7/29/2025 Manifesting Reality: How the Matrix, Quantum Entanglement, and Consciousness Intertwine Look, science fiction and science fact have been flirting for decades. But lately, the line between the two is starting to disappear. The idea that we’re living in a simulated reality isn’t just a late-night stoner theory anymore. It’s a framework, a lens to view those weird, unexplained moments that leave you thinking, "What the hell just happened?" Quantum entanglement, synchronicity, manifestation… they all start to make a lot more sense when you stop pretending reality is some rigid, mechanical machine. It’s not. It’s code. And if you’re paying attention, you might just figure out how to rewrite it. NPCs vs Manifestors: Who’s Really Running Things? Picture the world like a massive open-world video game. Some people are just running the default programming. They go to work, follow the script, consume what they’re told, and never ask questions. NPCs. Then the...

Search This Blog