Psychological Safety in Schools: A Question of Balance

By Matthew Hayward

Dear free thinkers,

In the midst of a tumultuous era, nowhere are changes more starkly evident than within our educational system. A decidedly progressive wave is shaping how our next generation understands the world through critical race theory, human diversity, and a spectrum of identities. At the forefront of these curricular alterations is the topic of gender identity. On the surface, this seems an empathetic, progressive stride aimed at reaching out to those wrestling with their identity in a society that can be less than accepting.

But it's worth asking ourselves: Are we prematurely introducing complex topics in the formative period of children's lives? Is there a hidden undercurrent of unintended consequences we need to consider? Could this result in unnecessary confusion among those who've never before questioned their gender identity? Is there a deliberate assault on the pillars of our societal structure, from the nuclear family to our free-market economic system?

To all these questions, the answer is a resounding yes.

Yet, this agenda is cloaked in commendable objectives. We all strive for a culture where our children understand, accept, and respect everyone, irrespective of their abilities, sex, or race. But as we venture into the realm of emotions and personal preferences, the waters become murkier. Not all viewpoints, especially those driven by personal feelings, warrant equal respect or consideration. For instance, society largely denounces the feelings of individuals harboring racist attitudes or adults expressing attraction towards minors, despite our unwavering commitment to the First Amendment.

The issue of transgender identity brings into play a complex web of emotions, personal identity, and societal expectations. While every individual has the right to express their feelings, it's clear that certain sentiments aren't appropriate to be shared in all contexts. Are we, in our quest to establish a safe space for a minority, inadvertently fostering confusion among the majority?

These concerns originate from a profound worry for the psychological well-being of all children. Children grappling with their gender identity require our support, understanding, and acceptance; they should never feel ostracized. However, we need to tread this path cautiously, ensuring that we aren't leading others into unnecessary self-questioning or doubt.

Educating children about psychological anomalies necessitates careful consideration of timing. It's essential to protect the psychological safety of children who are comfortable with their gender identity while extending our support to those wrestling with theirs. We must take care to avoid compromising the mental health of psychologically secure individuals in our efforts to accommodate those facing psychological challenges.

We owe it to our children to grant them the freedom to understand and explore the world without undue influence. In pursuit of this freedom, we must maintain a balance between empathy and understanding, making sure we don't unsettle the many in our quest to uplift a few.

A free mind is a mindful one. As we navigate the complexities of this world, let's resolve to remain curious, empathetic, and respectful. Let's commit to continually challenging ourselves and our perspectives. Stay well, free thinker, and tread lightly when it comes to our children.

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

By Matthew Hayward 9/19/2025 The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning. This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement. Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...

Reality Is Rigged and You Can Hack It

By Matthew Hayward 7/29/2025 Manifesting Reality: How the Matrix, Quantum Entanglement, and Consciousness Intertwine Look, science fiction and science fact have been flirting for decades. But lately, the line between the two is starting to disappear. The idea that we’re living in a simulated reality isn’t just a late-night stoner theory anymore. It’s a framework, a lens to view those weird, unexplained moments that leave you thinking, "What the hell just happened?" Quantum entanglement, synchronicity, manifestation… they all start to make a lot more sense when you stop pretending reality is some rigid, mechanical machine. It’s not. It’s code. And if you’re paying attention, you might just figure out how to rewrite it. NPCs vs Manifestors: Who’s Really Running Things? Picture the world like a massive open-world video game. Some people are just running the default programming. They go to work, follow the script, consume what they’re told, and never ask questions. NPCs. Then the...

Search This Blog