Psychological Safety in Schools: A Question of Balance

By Matthew Hayward

Dear free thinkers,

In the midst of a tumultuous era, nowhere are changes more starkly evident than within our educational system. A decidedly progressive wave is shaping how our next generation understands the world through critical race theory, human diversity, and a spectrum of identities. At the forefront of these curricular alterations is the topic of gender identity. On the surface, this seems an empathetic, progressive stride aimed at reaching out to those wrestling with their identity in a society that can be less than accepting.

But it's worth asking ourselves: Are we prematurely introducing complex topics in the formative period of children's lives? Is there a hidden undercurrent of unintended consequences we need to consider? Could this result in unnecessary confusion among those who've never before questioned their gender identity? Is there a deliberate assault on the pillars of our societal structure, from the nuclear family to our free-market economic system?

To all these questions, the answer is a resounding yes.

Yet, this agenda is cloaked in commendable objectives. We all strive for a culture where our children understand, accept, and respect everyone, irrespective of their abilities, sex, or race. But as we venture into the realm of emotions and personal preferences, the waters become murkier. Not all viewpoints, especially those driven by personal feelings, warrant equal respect or consideration. For instance, society largely denounces the feelings of individuals harboring racist attitudes or adults expressing attraction towards minors, despite our unwavering commitment to the First Amendment.

The issue of transgender identity brings into play a complex web of emotions, personal identity, and societal expectations. While every individual has the right to express their feelings, it's clear that certain sentiments aren't appropriate to be shared in all contexts. Are we, in our quest to establish a safe space for a minority, inadvertently fostering confusion among the majority?

These concerns originate from a profound worry for the psychological well-being of all children. Children grappling with their gender identity require our support, understanding, and acceptance; they should never feel ostracized. However, we need to tread this path cautiously, ensuring that we aren't leading others into unnecessary self-questioning or doubt.

Educating children about psychological anomalies necessitates careful consideration of timing. It's essential to protect the psychological safety of children who are comfortable with their gender identity while extending our support to those wrestling with theirs. We must take care to avoid compromising the mental health of psychologically secure individuals in our efforts to accommodate those facing psychological challenges.

We owe it to our children to grant them the freedom to understand and explore the world without undue influence. In pursuit of this freedom, we must maintain a balance between empathy and understanding, making sure we don't unsettle the many in our quest to uplift a few.

A free mind is a mindful one. As we navigate the complexities of this world, let's resolve to remain curious, empathetic, and respectful. Let's commit to continually challenging ourselves and our perspectives. Stay well, free thinker, and tread lightly when it comes to our children.

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

By Matthew Hayward 9/19/2025 The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning. This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement. Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...

Search This Blog