Skip to main content

The Heavy Toll of Reclaiming Freedom

By Matthew Hayward

The struggle for freedom has been a recurring act in the grand theater of human history. Yet, there is a philosophical argument that once freedoms are lost, they are irretrievably gone. This perspective, while disheartening, merits exploration. It's a chilling echo of the words of the trailblazing libertarian Claire Wolfe, "America is at that awkward stage; it's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards."

The first act in this tragic play is the rise of technology. As we advance technologically, the tools of distraction become more potent. The Roman Coliseum has been replaced by the smartphone, a device that can pacify and distract with unprecedented efficiency. This technological pacification, while seemingly benign, has a sinister side. It diverts attention from the erosion of freedoms, making it easier for those in power to chip away at our liberties unnoticed. Consider the pervasive surveillance facilitated by our digital footprints or the manipulation of public opinion through algorithmically curated news feeds.

The Second act is the retreat into apathy. As freedoms are lost, many people disengage instead of rising in protest. The more corrupt the system becomes, the less involved people are. This apathy is not born out of ignorance but rather a sense of helplessness. The belief that the system is too broken to fix leads to a withdrawal from civic engagement, further accelerating the loss of freedoms. But is surrendering to apathy truly the answer, or does it merely hasten our descent into despotism?

The final act is the exodus from society. As the situation worsens, some choose to leave the system entirely. They retreat into homesteading or off-grid living, seeking refuge from a society they perceive as irredeemably corrupt. While understandable, this exodus further weakens the people's collective power. But can we truly escape the reach of an overbearing government by simply withdrawing from society?

In this scenario, the hope for a mass uprising, a peaceful protest to reclaim lost rights, fades into the background. Instead, we are left with a slumbering populace living in a matrix of their own making. The only hope for reclaiming lost freedoms lies in the hands of a small group of radicals willing to risk everything. This mirrors the Revolutionary War, where only a small percentage of people stood up and fought.

This philosophical perspective paints a bleak picture. However, it serves as a stark reminder of the importance of vigilance in the face of encroaching power. The fight for freedom is continuous, and the moment we stop fighting, we start losing.

There is a call to action in the face of this bleak reality. It is a plea for involvement, for vigilance, for the refusal to surrender to the encroaching loss of freedoms. We must resist the allure of apathy and the false comfort of societal withdrawal. We must stay informed, stay engaged, and continue to question those in power. If we do not, we risk a future where our freedoms are hopelessly lost, and the only path to reclaim them is through a bloody revolution. This is not a future we should accept. So let us fight now with our voices, votes, and relentless pursuit of truth and justice. Let us fight now so we do not have to fight later with swords and shields.



Comments

  1. Excellent aarticle. Thank you for your discernment.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Fantastic article! So much truth in it, I do have so many questions though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, please share.

      I too have many questions, sadly there often isn't answers.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Grassroots Revolt Against GOP Elitism

By Matthew Hayward In the complex arena of political strategy, even those who occupy the highest echelons of power can falter, demonstrating a profound disconnect between their strategic intentions and operational execution. The recent failure to secure the endorsement for their preferred candidate, Dave Reichert, is not merely a setback; it is a revealing exposé of the grave strategic missteps at the heart of the Republican party's establishment in Washington State. These seasoned campaigners, these stewards of conservative strategy, have evidently underestimated the critical importance of grassroots engagement. While I acknowledge the logic behind promoting an established politician strategically positioned geographically and perceived as moderate in our swing state—a strategy driven by considerations of electability, which admittedly has its merits—the incessant focus on this argument and complete lack of any meaningful engagement and education has alienated the grassroots yet a...

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...

When the Census Goes Beyond the Constitution

 By Matthew Hayward The Census: From Counting People to Collecting Control The Constitution established the census as a straightforward tool for representation—nothing more, nothing less. Article I, Section 2 mandates an enumeration every ten years to determine how many representatives each state is allotted. That’s it. Simple. Effective. Proportional representation was the goal, and the census was designed to achieve it. So how did we end up here—with government agents asking about the number of bathrooms in our homes, our ethnic identities, and everything in between? This is the creeping hand of central planning at work. What began as a tool to empower individual representation has been twisted into a mechanism to empower bureaucrats, planners, and those who believe they know better than free individuals how to run their own lives. Central Planning: The False Promise of Data The justification for prying into the most intimate details of our lives is always the same: “We need the ...