Skip to main content

The Tipping Point: When Civil Disobedience Teeters on the Brink of Violent Resistance - Part II

By Matthew Hayward

In our first entry of this series, "The Tipping Point: When Civil Disobedience Teeters on the Brink of Violent Resistance," we delved into COVID-19 lockdown measures, an instance illuminating the delicate balance society often treads between civil disobedience and violent resistance.

In Minneapolis, the summer of 2020 was a sweltering cauldron of frustration, fear, and fury. The killing of George Floyd by police sparked an outcry and an inferno. Protestors packed streets and squares, demanding justice and systemic reform. Among the sea of protesters, a significant subset embarked on a path of destruction. The Twin Cities bore the brunt of this rage. As dusk descended on May 28, anarchy took hold. Buildings were engulfed in flames, stores ravaged by looting, and the city's infrastructure creaked under unprecedented strain. The Minneapolis third precinct police station, a symbolic focal point, was overpowered and set ablaze. This wasn't the work of just a 'few' -- it was a considerable faction within the more significant protest movement, acting in a way that eclipsed the message of those advocating for change peacefully.

The streets of Washington D.C., on December 12, 2020, presented a different tableau of conflict. It was ideological opposition between Antifa and the Proud Boys that ignited the city. Street fights erupted in the shadow of national monuments. Pepper spray filled the air, mace attacks left protestors and bystanders choking, and the flashing lights of ambulance vehicles painted the scene in eerie colors as the injured were transported to hospitals. The nation's capital was a battleground, a stark portrayal of the depth and volatility of political division.

January 6th, 2021, witnessed an unsettling scene at the U.S. Capitol. Thousands of supporters of then-President Donald Trump gathered, believing in election irregularities. While many remained outside, chanting, singing, and waving banners, a subset chose a more destructive path. After passing through barricades, in some cases strangely being let in by security, a mob proceeded to break out windows and force their way into the Captial. Windows were shattered, offices were ransacked, and in the chaos, a female protestor was fatally shot by Capitol Police.

Each of these situations was a tinderbox of tension, any tiny spark risking a conflagration. They serve as sobering reminders of how societal strains can manifest in sudden and explosive conflict. As we turn the page to Chapter Three, we look beyond these flashpoints to explore the broader societal forces that may be driving such polarization. Can we mend the rifts, douse the flames, and begin to rebuild trust in our communities? What comes next for this shining beacon on a hill?


The Tipping Point: When Civil Disobedience Teeters on the Brink of Violent Resistance - Part I
The Tipping Point: When Civil Disobedience Teeters on the Brink of Violent Resistance - Part III
Labels:
Location: Olympia, WA, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...
Post a Comment
Read more

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...
Post a Comment
Read more

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...
1 comment
Read more