Skip to main content

The Tipping Point: When Civil Disobedience Teeters on the Brink of Violent Resistance - Part II

By Matthew Hayward

In our first entry of this series, "The Tipping Point: When Civil Disobedience Teeters on the Brink of Violent Resistance," we delved into COVID-19 lockdown measures, an instance illuminating the delicate balance society often treads between civil disobedience and violent resistance.

In Minneapolis, the summer of 2020 was a sweltering cauldron of frustration, fear, and fury. The killing of George Floyd by police sparked an outcry and an inferno. Protestors packed streets and squares, demanding justice and systemic reform. Among the sea of protesters, a significant subset embarked on a path of destruction. The Twin Cities bore the brunt of this rage. As dusk descended on May 28, anarchy took hold. Buildings were engulfed in flames, stores ravaged by looting, and the city's infrastructure creaked under unprecedented strain. The Minneapolis third precinct police station, a symbolic focal point, was overpowered and set ablaze. This wasn't the work of just a 'few' -- it was a considerable faction within the more significant protest movement, acting in a way that eclipsed the message of those advocating for change peacefully.

The streets of Washington D.C., on December 12, 2020, presented a different tableau of conflict. It was ideological opposition between Antifa and the Proud Boys that ignited the city. Street fights erupted in the shadow of national monuments. Pepper spray filled the air, mace attacks left protestors and bystanders choking, and the flashing lights of ambulance vehicles painted the scene in eerie colors as the injured were transported to hospitals. The nation's capital was a battleground, a stark portrayal of the depth and volatility of political division.

January 6th, 2021, witnessed an unsettling scene at the U.S. Capitol. Thousands of supporters of then-President Donald Trump gathered, believing in election irregularities. While many remained outside, chanting, singing, and waving banners, a subset chose a more destructive path. After passing through barricades, in some cases strangely being let in by security, a mob proceeded to break out windows and force their way into the Captial. Windows were shattered, offices were ransacked, and in the chaos, a female protestor was fatally shot by Capitol Police.

Each of these situations was a tinderbox of tension, any tiny spark risking a conflagration. They serve as sobering reminders of how societal strains can manifest in sudden and explosive conflict. As we turn the page to Chapter Three, we look beyond these flashpoints to explore the broader societal forces that may be driving such polarization. Can we mend the rifts, douse the flames, and begin to rebuild trust in our communities? What comes next for this shining beacon on a hill?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...

Reality Is Rigged and You Can Hack It

By Matthew Hayward 7/29/2025 Manifesting Reality: How the Matrix, Quantum Entanglement, and Consciousness Intertwine Look, science fiction and science fact have been flirting for decades. But lately, the line between the two is starting to disappear. The idea that we’re living in a simulated reality isn’t just a late-night stoner theory anymore. It’s a framework, a lens to view those weird, unexplained moments that leave you thinking, "What the hell just happened?" Quantum entanglement, synchronicity, manifestation… they all start to make a lot more sense when you stop pretending reality is some rigid, mechanical machine. It’s not. It’s code. And if you’re paying attention, you might just figure out how to rewrite it. NPCs vs Manifestors: Who’s Really Running Things? Picture the world like a massive open-world video game. Some people are just running the default programming. They go to work, follow the script, consume what they’re told, and never ask questions. NPCs. Then the...