Embracing Artificial Intelligence and Cryptocurrency

Artificial intelligence (AI) often stirs a sense of unease in the realm of technology. Like any significant technological advancement, the rapid rise of AI is accompanied by a unique set of risks and challenges. As we observe the transformation of numerous industries, it's natural to feel a sense of trepidation.

However, I propose a slightly different viewpoint. At its core, technology is neutral. It's a tool that can be wielded for both good and ill. The pivotal question we should ask is not about the tool itself but who is wielding it and for what purpose. If those with benevolent intentions retreat from AI, they leave a void that could be filled by less altruistic forces. This underscores the importance of more 'good' individuals embracing AI and steering it towards a future that is beneficial for all of humanity.

This principle is equally applicable to the realm of cryptocurrency. While it's true that cryptocurrency can be exploited for nefarious purposes, it also harbors immense potential for positive transformation. From democratizing financial systems to fostering financial inclusion in underbanked regions, the true essence of cryptocurrency lies not in the technology itself but in how we choose to utilize it.

Adopting a balanced perspective toward technology is crucial. We should welcome its potential for good while remaining cognizant of its risks. It's essential to advocate for ethical usage and careful regulation. This approach ensures that technology, including AI and cryptocurrency, acts as a catalyst for human progress rather than a destructive force. By actively participating and providing direction, we can mold these tools for the betterment of society while maintaining individual liberty.

Let's delve into an idea that is deeply ingrained in the principles of free-market capitalism: 'creative destruction.' This term, coined by economist Joseph Schumpeter, implies that economic progress necessitates the downfall of outdated industries to pave the way for new ones. We've witnessed this transition from horse and buggy to automobiles, from analog to digital technology, and now with AI and automation.

While it's true that some jobs may become obsolete with these advancements, new ones will emerge—roles that we can't fully envision yet. Technology renders some jobs redundant, creating opportunities for other roles that offer more excellent value.

Frédéric Bastiat, in his satirical piece "The Candlemaker's Petition," humorously criticizes the idea of preserving jobs for their own sake. His argument is simple: our ultimate goal should not be to create jobs but to create value. Rejecting AI to preserve jobs is akin to advocating for a return to manual labor for tasks that machines can perform more efficiently. Embracing technological progress isn't anti-job—it's pro-growth, pro-efficiency, and pro-human.

Let's remember the principles of our free-market system. They encourage us to innovate, evolve, and adapt to the changing landscape rather than resisting change due to fear of short-term disruptions.

With this spirit of innovation and adaptability, I invite everyone to view AI and other technological advancements not as threats but as opportunities for economic growth and the creation of new, valuable industries.

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

By Matthew Hayward 9/19/2025 The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning. This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement. Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...

Search This Blog