Audit or eliminate the Fed?
My number one political issue for over three years has been the audit and subsequent abolition of the Federal Reserve Bank. With an understanding that the Federal Reserve is responsible for creating the environment for corporations and government to run ramped with malfeasance and mal-investment, I naturally believed that attacking the structural integrity of the Fed was a good cause. I trusted that addressing the immediate structural problem would, as a result, bring balance and liberty back to the marketplace. But what if there is more going on than meets the eye?
Could it be that while the liberty movement, supporters of freedom and free markets work to bring accountability or an end to the Federal Reserve, the men behind the scenes struggle to accommodate us? The collapsing of the economy was foreseeable and inevitable as was the coming battle for world government verse States and National Sovereignty. Is it possible that the collapse or restructure of the Federal Reserve and the global economy was inevitable and will lead to a larger and less accountable body?
Concerned since 2008 about the possibility of success battling the Federal Reserve, I have come to a more grave realization. The only way we will win is if the financial powers see a way to harness and exploit our energy. Surely there are contingency plans that do not include force against force, but instead, use the opponent's energy to accomplish their own ends. Is it possible that mobilization of the grassroots will only be opposed until they become strong enough to be of use to those they opposed?
Can structures as powerful as the multinational corporations and world banking system we currently have simply adopt new strategies to make the most profit and forward movement in their agendas? Is it possible that whatever course of action we take will ultimately be used against our desired outcome?
With hundreds of years of political and social knowledge, those in places of power are well aware of the Hegelian dialectic, problem reaction solution. Surely it makes sense from time to time to create a problem when you have ample evidence of how the populist and electorate will react. Once the people or bewildered heard do as they were engineered to do, something happens, “it’s an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before.” Rahm Emanuel
To what level who knew/knows what, I am not sure. What I know is, regardless of what happens, those who seek power and control for humanitarian or other reasons will use these times of uncertainty to push forth an agenda that will only be accepted or allowed out of fear.
Could it be that while the liberty movement, supporters of freedom and free markets work to bring accountability or an end to the Federal Reserve, the men behind the scenes struggle to accommodate us? The collapsing of the economy was foreseeable and inevitable as was the coming battle for world government verse States and National Sovereignty. Is it possible that the collapse or restructure of the Federal Reserve and the global economy was inevitable and will lead to a larger and less accountable body?
Concerned since 2008 about the possibility of success battling the Federal Reserve, I have come to a more grave realization. The only way we will win is if the financial powers see a way to harness and exploit our energy. Surely there are contingency plans that do not include force against force, but instead, use the opponent's energy to accomplish their own ends. Is it possible that mobilization of the grassroots will only be opposed until they become strong enough to be of use to those they opposed?
Can structures as powerful as the multinational corporations and world banking system we currently have simply adopt new strategies to make the most profit and forward movement in their agendas? Is it possible that whatever course of action we take will ultimately be used against our desired outcome?
With hundreds of years of political and social knowledge, those in places of power are well aware of the Hegelian dialectic, problem reaction solution. Surely it makes sense from time to time to create a problem when you have ample evidence of how the populist and electorate will react. Once the people or bewildered heard do as they were engineered to do, something happens, “it’s an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before.” Rahm Emanuel
To what level who knew/knows what, I am not sure. What I know is, regardless of what happens, those who seek power and control for humanitarian or other reasons will use these times of uncertainty to push forth an agenda that will only be accepted or allowed out of fear.
Comments
Post a Comment