Skip to main content

Personal Testimony On How My Political Self Came To Be

by Matthew Edward Hayward on Saturday, February 11, 2012


I'm going to try to keep this brief.

I was close minded and that didn't work out well and I was unhappy. I became open minded and continue to learn and grow and now I'm happy. That about sums it up.





Personal testimony on how my political self came to be

I'm sure my views will change based on life experience and new information. Information is certainly something I’m open to. Until 2006, I was a neoconservative, voted for and supported George Bush. I could have been quoted as saying, “Turn the whole Middle East into a sheet of glass.” I was not a dissenting voice within the GOP, just a foot soldier willing to blindly trust and do the grunt work.

My views began to change when I stopped having blind faith in people and political parties. I surrendered my life to God, gave up old ideas, became open to new messages, and received help with drinking. I got rid of my TV, no more FOX news, and started going out to dinners with people from all walks of life and religious beliefs. I learned that my thinking had been very black-and-white, and scenarios were often much more complicated than I had thought.

I did something amazing, I started doing my own research instead of trusting corporate media outlets that were all dependent on the same sponsors, and most of which were owned by the same people. More importantly, the large media outlets were in the business of ratings and entertainment, not journalism and news. I found social media, bloggers, and activists that were on the ground uploading live video without commentary, I was finally able to start being allowed to write my own narrative instead of having professional public opinion molders feed me theirs.

The next thing I did was also critical; I began to read philosophy, Aristotle, Plato, and more. Then I started reading about Freud, Alfred Adler, John Dewey, William James, Carl Jung, Maslow, Pavlov, Skinner, Watson, Henry David Thoreau, Robert Anton Wilson, and one of my favorites, Timothy Leary.

After independently studying sociology, psychology, and communication (Edward Louis Bernays and Noam Chomsky, among many others), I concluded that Mark Twain nailed it. “If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you're misinformed.” I took this newly gained education and began to apply it to all that I read, taking things with a grain of sand and comparing them to a variety of sources.

My news comes from a wide array of sources, whatever my Facebook community feels is important and is posting. I purposefully have networked myself with people who hold many different views and many different values and ideologies. I also check in with the Daily Paul, The Drudge Report, and RT. The only time I look at newspapers is when I’m staying in a hotel or going out to eat and notice the headlines in the paper box. The only time I see cable news is when people on Facebook post links to it, such as CNN, FOX, MSNBC, etc., which is quite often, I might add. If I were to know what is happening at OWS or any similar event, the last place I am going to go is the mainstream media. You could not get a less intellectually honest point of view than from FOX, CNN, and MSNBC. Generally, I find an on-the-ground activist journalist and watch their incredibly boring live feed (possibly more boring than golf and C-span).

My current views are heavily Influenced by books like The Grand Chessboard, The Political Brain, 1984, Brave New World, Confessions Of An Economic Hit Man, The Art Of War, The Big Book, Propaganda, The Law, and The Way Of The Peaceful Warrior.

I’ve learned that it is much easier to listen to things that make us feel good and not challenge our beliefs than to be open to new ideas and seek new perspectives. It is much easier to feed talking points and one-sided perspectives dolled up as “fair and balanced” than to have to think for ourselves, do research, and draw our own conclusions.

Lastly, my views are not political in nature; they are philosophical, moral, and ethically based. Principles are not based on sound bites and propaganda, and they have nothing to do with political party strategy and the desire for power.

P.S. I have not had a TV since 2006 and have no plans to ever have one again.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Heavy Toll of Reclaiming Freedom

By Matthew Hayward The struggle for freedom has been a recurring act in the grand theater of human history. Yet, there is a philosophical argument that once freedoms are lost, they are irretrievably gone. This perspective, while disheartening, merits exploration. It's a chilling echo of the words of the trailblazing libertarian Claire Wolfe, "America is at that awkward stage; it's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." The first act in this tragic play is the rise of technology. As we advance technologically, the tools of distraction become more potent. The Roman Coliseum has been replaced by the smartphone, a device that can pacify and distract with unprecedented efficiency. This technological pacification, while seemingly benign, has a sinister side. It diverts attention from the erosion of freedoms, making it easier for those in power to chip away at our liberties unnoticed. Consider the pervasive surveillance facilitated by our ...

How the Drug War Killed Liberty

 By Matthew Hayward 10/25/2025 When the State Declares War on Behavior Earlier this month, President Trump ordered United States military strikes off the coast of Venezuela, killing alleged “narcoterrorists.” He later boasted, “ We’re just going to kill people that are bringing drugs into our country. ” Those words should chill every American who believes in liberty. Fifty years after Nixon declared his war on drugs, it has evolved from domestic raids to international executions, all under the same failed philosophy that government violence can cure human vice. When the state declares war on human behavior, it always loses and takes the people down with it. Every prison cell, every overdose, every cartel bullet is a monument to the arrogance of government trying to legislate morality. Back in 1988, Ron Paul said it best on The Morton Downey Jr. Show: “You can’t legislate morality. You can’t force people to be better by passing laws. If you want to solve moral and social problems, y...

The Quiet Surrender of Liberty

 By Matthew Hayward The slow poison of complacency is the death of the fighting spirit. History is filled with examples of once-free people who gradually surrendered their liberty, not in a single stroke but through a series of quiet concessions. Tyranny often doesn’t arrive with the sound of thunder; it creeps in like a thief in the night, taking advantage of human complacency. The most maddening aspect of this process is not the power-hungry forces behind it, it is the passive, apathetic acceptance by the very people it seeks to control. Complacency is the death knell of liberty. It dulls the senses, erodes vigilance, and normalizes oppression over time. What once sparked outrage and resistance becomes routine, accepted as the new normal. The body scanners at TSA checkpoints, the Patriot Act, the ever-expanding surveillance state, each started with public protests and fiery debates. Now, these violations of privacy and freedom are woven into the fabric of everyday life. Why do pe...