Skip to main content

What's the Point

Albert Einstein was right when he said, "Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions." Furthermore, I believe that we have reached the point of such moral degeneration that not only is there little hope of things getting better or even maintaining, but I almost look forward to the pain and suffering of all who embraced the evil with their indifference and willing ignorance.

Americans are selfish, materialistic, apathetic, narrow-minded, arrogant, lazy, pathetic drones. The majority are mental slaves, automatons. Trying to inform and motivate Americans to better themselves is like trying to talk a drunk out of going to the bar; it's a waste of time. I often ask drunks, "What will it take? How bad does it have to get?" Many of them have to die; most of them are not coming out of it. Americans are the same way; it will take a tragedy of massive proportions,  and even then, many will still keep their heads so far up their asses they will still fail to change.

I can hardly bear to listen to the political opinions of those who blame the two-party system, the need for campaign finance reform, and double-talking candidates who lack integrity. These same people continue to re-elect incumbents, vote within the two parties when provided alternatives on the ballot, and rarely donate to those they truly support.

We also have those who blame our Presidents and or Congress. Someone ought to tell these morons that our government is elected by the people and is a direct representation of the morality of our society. We are not a virtuous society; therefore, we do not elect virtuous Representatives. We don't educate ourselves to make positive and rational decisions regarding our country's policymakers, the very people who are to defend our freedoms.

"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves. If we think they are not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them but to inform their discretion by education. This is the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power."
-- Thomas Jefferson



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Could Today Be the Cheapest Price for Bitcoin Ever Again? Here’s Why

By: Matthew Hayward Current price  Nov 10, 2024 76.72K 80.43K Is Now the Time to Buy Bitcoin? Bitcoin has come a long way since its early days as a niche digital asset. Today, as we enter another phase in its established four-year cycle , Bitcoin may be at a historic high, but it could soon become the new baseline price. This cycle, which has repeatedly shown Bitcoin’s resilience and long-term growth potential, suggests that the current price might be the lowest we’ll see again. While recent political shifts, including Donald Trump’s landslide election victory, have added new momentum and support for Bitcoin, the timing within the cycle itself makes this an ideal moment to consider buying. A Political Shift: From Anti-Crypto to Pro-Crypto For years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have faced an uphill battle against a U.S. government determined to restrict and control their growth. This opposition was largely led by Gary Gensler, who waged an outright war against crypto from hi...

When Government Demands Papers We Refuse

 By Matthew Hayward  9/19/2025  The Supreme Court just paused a lower court order that had limited federal immigration stops in Los Angeles. That stay lets federal agents resume roving patrols and interior operations that critics say rely on appearance, language, job, or neighborhood to pick people for questioning.  This matters because it normalizes a posture of suspicion. Checkpoints miles inland and roving patrols turn movement inside the country into a condition to be earned rather than a freedom to be enjoyed. The government already claims expanded authority inside the 100-mile border zone. That claim, plus an open green light for stops based on appearance, is a recipe for arbitrary enforcement.  Philosophy of resistance John Locke told us that the consent of the governed is the foundation of legitimate power. When rulers invade life, liberty, or property, or when they become arbitrary disposers of people’s lives and fortunes, the social compact is dissolve...

The National Guard Was Never Meant to Be a Federal Tool

By Matthew Hayward 7/13/2025 Let me say this clearly: the National Guard was created to defend the states, not to enforce the will of the federal government. It was meant to serve as a local militia—an armed extension of the people under the control of the state. The highest authority a Guard member was ever supposed to answer to is their elected governor, not a bureaucrat in Washington, not a federal agency, and certainly not a sitting president weaponizing military force on domestic soil. Yes, I know the laws have changed. I know the Montgomery Amendment, the National Defense Act, and the Supreme Court's decision in Perpich v. DoD rewrote the rules. But legal doesn’t mean constitutional. Gradualism doesn’t legitimize usurpation. You don’t get to trample foundational principles and call it progress. What’s happening now—federalizing state forces to deploy them in cities without gubernatorial consent—is blasphemous. It's an insult to the very spirit of the Constitution. The ...